Why Law Firms May Be Better Prepared for Another Recession: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 06, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
RECESSION READY? - After two years of record-setting financial results, Big Law is facing headwinds as the economy teeters toward a potential downturn. But law firms may be better prepared to weather a recession this time around. Analysts told Law.com's Andrew Maloney that the economic tumult of the late 2000s put focus on liquidity, and law firms generally responded by fortifying their balance sheets. Now, firms are significantly less leveraged than they were before the Great Recession, said Michael McKenney, a senior client adviser and business development officer at Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group. Their balance sheets are stronger, the quality of the funding is higher, and to the extent they need credit, they have more guaranteed now than before, according to McKenney. Meanwhile, the pandemic also offered an important learning experience for firms. Having survived and thrived during such a monumental shift in 2020 has arguably made firms and their people more resilient for challenges in 2022 and beyond. "You're not going to fix a recession by working from home," said Kay Hoppe, a legal recruiter based in Chicago. "But the notion of survival, agility — it seems to me [firms] were empowered by having that experience."
NEW SCHOOL - As students return to law schools next month, they will be facing a very different landscape, both personally and professionally, now that the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade and demonstrated a shifting attitude toward constitutional issues. As a result, Law.com's Christine Charnosky reports, law schools will be forced to juggle supporting students emotionally while teaching new laws. Meanwhile, some schools also may have to reckon with their future enrollment numbers taking a hit because of the high court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. "Some colleagues across the country are organizing Zoom calls about how we can teach reproductive rights post-Dobbs," Sital Kalantry, associate dean for international and graduate programs at Seattle University School of Law, told Charnosky. "We are talking about where we go from here," she said, "How do we teach the subject now?" Law school leaders, Kalantry said, are also asking, "How can we help students cope with this decision—what does the decision say, what does it mean, what are the implications?"
ON THE RADAR - Ben & Jerry's filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit Tuesday against its parent company Unilever to block an agreement that would restore the sale of its ice cream products in the West Bank. The lawsuit, filed by Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing and Cohen & Gresser, seeks an injunction preventing Unilever's U.S. subsidiary Conopco Inc. from selling Ben & Jerry's products in the West Bank through a third-party distributor in contravention of a 2021 decision by Ben & Jerry's Independent Board of Directors. The suit was prompted by a June 29 announcement from Unilever that it has sold its Ben & Jerry's business interests in Israel to the owner of its Israel-based licensee. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:22-cv-05681, Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. v. Conopco, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
West Virginia Judge Rules Against Drug Distributors in Opioid Case By Amanda Bronstad |
NCCU Appoints Interim Dean Following Browne Lewis' Death By Christine Charnosky |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250