Am Law 100 Valuations Take a Hit: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 08, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
VALUE SUBTRACT - TGIF because we've got some sour news for Am Law 100 fans. Despite record profits last year, the collective valuation of those firms, as calculated by one analyst, has plunged over the last seven months, following the trajectory of the S&P 500 Index. Applying his proprietary methodology for the third time to the American Lawyer's own data, Hunton Andrews Kurth CFO Madhav Srinivasan found in June that, based on figures from the 2022 Am Law 100 report, the valuations of these firms had dropped by 8.3% since he last performed the analysis in November 2021. While the drop in valuations doesn't immediately impact the finances of equity partners, it serves as an indication that they're no less sheltered from external pressures than conventional businesses. "The law firm valuation model is holding," Srinivasan told Law.com's Dan Packel. "We've had three data points to check, and all three times, it's been in consonance with the general S&P index." Srinivasan credited rising interest rates for the lion's share of the decline in valuations since the previous exercise, when he used 2021 Am Law 100 data. These rising rates, a product of Federal Reserve policy to combat surging inflation, have driven up the cost of debt and the cost of equity.
REMOTE REPERCUSSIONS - Virtual court has caught on in a big way in recent years, with many judges, court administrators, attorneys and clients praising its efficiency and endorsing its continued use. But it was never a great fit with criminal proceedings, causing many in the legal community to raise concerns about infringing on defendants' rights with remote technology throughout the pandemic. And, Law.com's Alaina Lancaster writes in this week's Barometer newsletter, that fit is only becoming more uncomfortable. "As courts continue to deploy remote technology in criminal cases, serious and immediate problems will likely continue to surface," Lancaster writes. "Reports of the failures of the technology might be enough to deter adoption of remote technology for criminal proceedings in most court systems across the country. Still, lawmakers and judges who value the possible benefits of the technology might take on the problems that will emerge, develop best practices and provide a roadmap for the rest of the nation."
ON THE RADAR - Comedian Lewis Black filed a copyright infringement lawsuit Thursday in California Central District Court against streaming service Pandora. The lawsuit, filed by King & Ballow, accuses Pandora of digitally broadcasting sixty-eight of his recorded works without permission. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-04634, Black v. Pandora Media, LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoes Your Corporate Compliance Program Reasonably Prevent Fraud? New UK Guidance Demands It
11 minute readKPMG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250