Am Law 100 Valuations Take a Hit: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 08, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
VALUE SUBTRACT - TGIF because we've got some sour news for Am Law 100 fans. Despite record profits last year, the collective valuation of those firms, as calculated by one analyst, has plunged over the last seven months, following the trajectory of the S&P 500 Index. Applying his proprietary methodology for the third time to the American Lawyer's own data, Hunton Andrews Kurth CFO Madhav Srinivasan found in June that, based on figures from the 2022 Am Law 100 report, the valuations of these firms had dropped by 8.3% since he last performed the analysis in November 2021. While the drop in valuations doesn't immediately impact the finances of equity partners, it serves as an indication that they're no less sheltered from external pressures than conventional businesses. "The law firm valuation model is holding," Srinivasan told Law.com's Dan Packel. "We've had three data points to check, and all three times, it's been in consonance with the general S&P index." Srinivasan credited rising interest rates for the lion's share of the decline in valuations since the previous exercise, when he used 2021 Am Law 100 data. These rising rates, a product of Federal Reserve policy to combat surging inflation, have driven up the cost of debt and the cost of equity.
REMOTE REPERCUSSIONS - Virtual court has caught on in a big way in recent years, with many judges, court administrators, attorneys and clients praising its efficiency and endorsing its continued use. But it was never a great fit with criminal proceedings, causing many in the legal community to raise concerns about infringing on defendants' rights with remote technology throughout the pandemic. And, Law.com's Alaina Lancaster writes in this week's Barometer newsletter, that fit is only becoming more uncomfortable. "As courts continue to deploy remote technology in criminal cases, serious and immediate problems will likely continue to surface," Lancaster writes. "Reports of the failures of the technology might be enough to deter adoption of remote technology for criminal proceedings in most court systems across the country. Still, lawmakers and judges who value the possible benefits of the technology might take on the problems that will emerge, develop best practices and provide a roadmap for the rest of the nation."
ON THE RADAR - Comedian Lewis Black filed a copyright infringement lawsuit Thursday in California Central District Court against streaming service Pandora. The lawsuit, filed by King & Ballow, accuses Pandora of digitally broadcasting sixty-eight of his recorded works without permission. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-04634, Black v. Pandora Media, LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Labor of Law: Employer Statements on Abortion Could Spur Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment Claims By Jessica Mach |
'Clearly Comedy': Dismissal of Roy Moore's Defamation Suit Against Sacha Baron Cohen Upheld by 2nd Circuit By Jane Wester |
How I Made Partner: 'I Worked to Make Authentic Connections With Partners Across Offices,' Says Avia M. Dunn of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom By Tasha Norman |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Federal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250