How Firms Are Bringing Associates Back Into the Fold: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 12, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
KIDS IN THE HALL - For more than two years, many new associates have known only remote work. But, as Law.com's Brenda Sapino Jeffreys reports, some law firms are aiming to change that by inviting their young attorneys to finally meet, in person, the teams they've been working with virtually. The idea behind these initiatives is that in-person interactions with colleagues will deepen interpersonal relationships, foster professional development and, ultimately, improve retention. "Being in a hallway, you are more likely to be roped into the thing," Monica Latin, the managing partner of Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, said during a recent State Bar of Texas seminar on how COVID-19 affected retention at firms. Marci Borgal Shunk, founder and president of The Tilt Institute, said building connections between lawyers is essential in the war for talent, and to spread the firm's culture. But, she added, face-time and flexibility can and should still be able to coexist. According to Shunk, academic research shows that firms should identify certain days for teams to be in the office to ensure that all of the lawyers who work together are having regular in-person interactions. "If you are not in the office, you need to be deliberate and intentional about what you are doing to define your culture and that cultural experience for everybody across the firm," Shunk said.
CONSIDER THE ALTERNATIVES - Over the past decade, insurance defense lawyers have been increasingly using alternative fee arrangements and low-cost staffing models. Turns out, they may have been on the cutting edge of the legal profession this whole time. "The insurance industry has become far more sophisticated and dependent on analytics, and so they are constantly evaluating the key performance indicators [KPIs] of their panel counsel and they're comparing them to one another," G. Mark Thompson, CEO of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, told Law.com's Justin Henry. "If they see a decline in those KPIs, that could threaten the continued engagement of that firm," Thompson added, "so you better not let your reputation fall." Competition for work among panel firms has grown stiffer in subsequent years; many firms are now required to use paralegals for certain tasks that previously would have been performed by a lawyer, such as reviewing evidence, document review and preparing exhibits. As the U.S. economy slows, Peggy Kruza, a Philadelphia-area legal industry staff recruiter, said more law practices could start to reallocate attorney work to paralegals in order to keep billing for institutional clients competitive.
ON THE RADAR - Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners and American Tower Corp. announced a $2.5 billion partnership Monday in a deal guided by a bevy of law firms. Stonepeak, on behalf of certain affiliated investment vehicles, has agreed to acquire an ownership interest of approximately 29% in American Tower's U.S. data center business. American Tower will retain managerial, operational and day-to-day control of the business. The transaction, announced July 11, is expected to close in the third quarter of 2022. New York-based Stonepeak is represented by Sidley Austin. American Tower, based in Boston, is advised by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; and Sullivan & Worcester. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Would You Take on a Client Who Previously Sued Your Law Firm for Malpractice? By Allison Dunn |
McGuireWoods Asks En Banc 4th Circuit to Nix Attorney Fees Limitation By Brad Kutner |
Federal Judge Rejects 'Coercive,' 'Illusory' Class Action Settlement With Turning Point Restaurants By Marianna Wharry |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 2US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 3From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 5Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250