How to Make It: Choosing the Right Law Firm to Build Your Career
Today's young professionals tend to think it's not where you land but what destination you've chosen.
July 14, 2022 at 09:52 AM
3 minute read
How I Made ItWhere Do You Want to Work?
Law school graduates and many associates spend lots of time figuring out where they want to work. Currently, in the days of the post-COVID "great reshuffle," lateral moves between law firms have become more frequent, and many young lawyers need to create a set of criteria for choosing the places they want to go.
Lawyers often talk about a new workplace as where they "landed," but today's young professionals tend to think more intentionally. It's not where you land but what destination you've chosen.
In our "How I Made Partner" interviews this year, we've included the question, "What were your criteria for joining your present firm?" The answers varied, and some have been surprising.
Some partners had a simple, pointed set of benchmarks. "Culture, fit, and opportunity," said Peter Bogdasarian of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young.
And Shari Dwoskin, a partner at Brown Rudnick, told us, "I was simply looking for a firm in Boston where the work was interesting, where the people were nice, and where I could make an impact."
"I wanted a work/life balance and that's really hard to find when you work in New York City," said Karuna Chandani Simbeck of Klasko Immigration Law Partners. "I was also looking to widen my areas of expertise."
Other lawyers were very specific about the legal environment they were seeking. James Ray of Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr gave us this list: "I looked for a firm with 1) a reputation for excellent results and client service; 2) people that enjoyed their work and working together; and 3) opportunities for a young lawyer to grow and develop a practice."
"I was looking for a firm that worked on high-level and challenging projects, had a reputation for being a steward in the market, and was a good cultural fit," said Brian Dillon, an office managing partner at Lathrop GPM. "The size of the firm was also important to me. I was looking for a place that attracted challenging and complex work but was not so big that junior attorneys get lost in the shuffle."
Cyrus Chin, a partner at Balch & Bingham, had specific advice for graduates on how to develop their criteria: "Be very thoughtful about the relationship between your law school and your final destination, whether that destination is a geographic one or a particular practice area. Talk to alumni more than career services."
ALM's Professionals Network on LinkedIn, Advancing Future Leaders. We are excited about this pivotal group. Click here to join.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'Leaders Must Be Good Listeners,' Says Dan Summerlin of Woods Rogers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250