To Improve Profitability, Firms Get Back to Basics: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 28, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BACK TO BASICS - Despite law firm profits soaring in the last year, firm partnerships are increasingly uncertain about the future. As a result, according to new survey results, law firms are now doubling down on financial fundamentals such as pricing, clients development and talent, Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports. The 2022 Law Firm Profitability Survey from LawVision and Iridium Technology, published this week, found that nine out of 10 firms were satisfied or very satisfied with their profits over the last three years, and more than a quarter of respondents reported double-digit profit growth during that span. Still, factors such as inflation and geopolitical tension are coloring firm leaders' outlook. So instead of firm leaders focusing on big projects to innovate or transform their firm, the report authors highlighted a strong move toward what they called "profit fundamentals" this year, with firms focusing on pricing, production, talent strategy and client initiatives. The report likened it to football, with firms focusing on "basic blocking and tackling" as opposed to more dramatic changes. "We're starting to see this much greater push on—are we leveraged right? Are we utilizing our capacity effectively? We didn't see that in the same way in 2020. In fact, we haven't seen that in nearly the same way in previous years, so I do wonder if this isn't some form of a post-pandemic, kind of trying to find normal," said Mark Medice, principal at LawVision and one of the authors of the report.
PAY TO STAY - The money is getting bigger for almost every in-house legal position as companies shower top legal department talent with cash to keep them from leaving for more green, according to the latest annual global in-house compensation survey from Major, Lindsey & Africa. The MLA report, which is based on responses from 3,300 corporate counsel in 46 countries, showed that total actual cash compensation, which is salary plus bonus comp, for U.S.-based legal chiefs has increased 15% since 2020, hitting an average of $578,446. Michael Sachs, a Chicago-based in-house counsel recruiter at MLA, told Law.com's Phillip Bantz that lower-level counsel pay slipped, at least in part, because companies are throwing more money at upper-level legal department leaders to keep them from heading for the exit. "Retention was a huge factor," he said, noting that law firms and corporate legal departments have been engaged in an intense battle for legal talent over the past year, which he described as "probably the busiest year we've seen for movement in the in-house ranks." "Lots of general counsel were changing companies," he added. "Any company out there was realizing that their people have moved on or might move on. A big part of the compensation increase was to make sure that their people weren't such a flight risk anymore."
ON THE RADAR - Ice Miller filed a lawsuit Wednesday in Ohio Southern District Court on behalf of Bantam Bagels, a company featured on the popular reality television series 'Shark Tank,' and T. Marzetti Co. The suit targets Orange Streak over a $34 million asset purchase agreement. The plaintiffs dispute the defendant's assertion that it is entitled to an 'earn-out' following Bantam's failure to turn a profit after third party Starbucks terminated its contract. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-02950, T. Marzetti Company et al v. Orange Streak, LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
Job Market for 2021 Law School Grads the 'Strongest Ever,' NALP Reports By Christine Charnosky |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250