To Improve Profitability, Firms Get Back to Basics: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 28, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BACK TO BASICS - Despite law firm profits soaring in the last year, firm partnerships are increasingly uncertain about the future. As a result, according to new survey results, law firms are now doubling down on financial fundamentals such as pricing, clients development and talent, Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports. The 2022 Law Firm Profitability Survey from LawVision and Iridium Technology, published this week, found that nine out of 10 firms were satisfied or very satisfied with their profits over the last three years, and more than a quarter of respondents reported double-digit profit growth during that span. Still, factors such as inflation and geopolitical tension are coloring firm leaders' outlook. So instead of firm leaders focusing on big projects to innovate or transform their firm, the report authors highlighted a strong move toward what they called "profit fundamentals" this year, with firms focusing on pricing, production, talent strategy and client initiatives. The report likened it to football, with firms focusing on "basic blocking and tackling" as opposed to more dramatic changes. "We're starting to see this much greater push on—are we leveraged right? Are we utilizing our capacity effectively? We didn't see that in the same way in 2020. In fact, we haven't seen that in nearly the same way in previous years, so I do wonder if this isn't some form of a post-pandemic, kind of trying to find normal," said Mark Medice, principal at LawVision and one of the authors of the report.
PAY TO STAY - The money is getting bigger for almost every in-house legal position as companies shower top legal department talent with cash to keep them from leaving for more green, according to the latest annual global in-house compensation survey from Major, Lindsey & Africa. The MLA report, which is based on responses from 3,300 corporate counsel in 46 countries, showed that total actual cash compensation, which is salary plus bonus comp, for U.S.-based legal chiefs has increased 15% since 2020, hitting an average of $578,446. Michael Sachs, a Chicago-based in-house counsel recruiter at MLA, told Law.com's Phillip Bantz that lower-level counsel pay slipped, at least in part, because companies are throwing more money at upper-level legal department leaders to keep them from heading for the exit. "Retention was a huge factor," he said, noting that law firms and corporate legal departments have been engaged in an intense battle for legal talent over the past year, which he described as "probably the busiest year we've seen for movement in the in-house ranks." "Lots of general counsel were changing companies," he added. "Any company out there was realizing that their people have moved on or might move on. A big part of the compensation increase was to make sure that their people weren't such a flight risk anymore."
ON THE RADAR - Ice Miller filed a lawsuit Wednesday in Ohio Southern District Court on behalf of Bantam Bagels, a company featured on the popular reality television series 'Shark Tank,' and T. Marzetti Co. The suit targets Orange Streak over a $34 million asset purchase agreement. The plaintiffs dispute the defendant's assertion that it is entitled to an 'earn-out' following Bantam's failure to turn a profit after third party Starbucks terminated its contract. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-02950, T. Marzetti Company et al v. Orange Streak, LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Job Market for 2021 Law School Grads the 'Strongest Ever,' NALP Reports By Christine Charnosky |
Judge With History of Sexist Comments Called Out, Again, by 5th Circuit By Brad Kutner |
The Marble Palace Blog: Justice Barrett's 'Austere and Desert-Like' Writing Style By Tony Mauro |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMany Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readLife Sciences M&A Set to Boom, Litigation to Remain Steady Under New Trump Admin
5 minute read'Innovation Over Regulation': Tech Litigators and Experts Share Insights on the Future of AI, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Under Trump
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 2Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 3Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
- 4Against the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
- 5US Supreme Court Justices Pass on Landlord Challenge to NY Rent Stabilization
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250