Grubhub Delivery Drivers Are Not Exempt From Arbitration, Massachusetts High Court Says
"It is instructive that, on nearly identical facts to those in the present case," Justice Dalila Argaez Wendlandt stated, citing 'Wallace v. Grubhub,' "the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that Grubhub drivers were 'transportation workers,' but not engaged in interstate commerce as required by the residual clause."
August 04, 2022 at 02:48 PM
5 minute read
Class ActionsThe Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has found that Grubhub delivery drivers do not fall within a category of exempt workers under the Federal Arbitration Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute read'We're Back': Fourth Circuit Considers Certification of Marriott Data Breach Class ... Again
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250