Critical Mass by Law.com's Ellen Bardash: Toxic Tort Firms Plan for North Carolina Veteran Suits. A Federal Judge Dismissed Ally Bank Leak Claims.
Toxic tort attorneys across the country are getting ready for claims from veterans exposed to toxic water.
August 10, 2022 at 11:53 AM
6 minute read
Critical Mass
Welcome to Law.com Class Actions: Critical Mass, a weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. Toxic tort attorneys across the country are getting ready for claims from veterans exposed to toxic water. A district court judge found an Ally Bank data leak was unlikely to harm consumers. Two years after an Eleventh Circuit decision barring incentive awards, attorneys are still asking for a rehearing.
I'm Ellen Bardash, filling in for Amanda Bronstad. Feel free to email me with your input at [email protected], or get in touch with Amanda at [email protected]. You can follow me on Twitter @Dellenware and Amanda @abronstadlaw.
Credit: photopixel/Shutterstock.com Attorneys Gear Up for Veterans' Water-Related Suits
A section of the Honoring Our PACT Act, passed by Congress earlier this month, allows hundreds of thousands of veterans who were exposed to water at the Marine Corps' Camp Lejeune base to sue, and attorneys nationwide have indicated they're ready to represent them if President Joe Biden signs the act into law.
The bill's Camp Lejeune Justice Act gives the right to sue in the Eastern District of North Carolina to anyone who came into contact with water at the camp between 1953 and 1957, which is said to have caused a variety of medical issues including cancers, miscarriages and birth defects. One million people at the camp may have been exposed, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Be Open With Partners About Your Strengths,' Says Ha Jin Lee of Sullivan & Cromwell
- 3Essential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
- 4The Coordinate Jurisdiction Rule on Insurance Bad Faith Litigation
- 5South Carolina Physicians Challenge Abortion Ban Under Religious Freedom Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
