Dollar's Strength Gives Law Firms Lots to Think About: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 10, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Law Firm Management
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
NEW TECH, SAME LAWS? - We are living in a material world—but pretty soon we could all be spending a lot more time in the metaverse. That (virtual) reality has attorneys thinking a lot these days about whether and how real world laws might apply in this new corner of cyberspace. As Law.com's Cassandre Coyer reports, trademark protection attorneys are paying close attention to developments that could shape the future of trademark protection law to advise companies on the next best step to protect their brands. "The law tends to lag behind any form of technology, improvement or invention, discovery even. So there's always a lag between sort of the discovery of something new and how the law is going to treat it," said Matt Braunel, registered patent attorney and partner at Thompson Coburn. "I think the first step is going to be for the law to try and determine if traditional legal concepts are applicable to the metaverse." Answering that question will depend on whether products in the metaverse are considered goods and services or art, said Ron N. Dreben, a partner at Morgan Lewis where he advises clients on intellectual property and technology issues in business transactions. "The metaverse arguably is a lot of digital art, because we're seeing icons, it's a lot of artwork. And when trademarks are used in the context of art, as compared to use on a good or service, the standard of what may constitute infringement or violation is different," Dreben explained.
DECISIONS ON THE DOLLAR - Law firms won't totally pivot their international strategies based on the fluctuating value of currency. But the dollar's increased strength does give firms something else to think about when they set their prices, Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports. Will Shields, a partner in the private equity practice at Ropes & Gray and a member of the firm's policy committee, said it "certainly" becomes an issue for firms to manage when they consider their billing rates. "Most of us bill in dollars, and in a global practice you have to think about your cost and how it's spread across the world," Shields said. Exchange rates also matter when setting lawyer compensation, attorneys told Maloney. Just as American tourists might be able to get more bang for their bucks on vacation in Europe right now, U.S. law firms could also get a boost from the greenback's extra purchasing power on the lateral market, analysts said. "Because they can pay more based on the strength of the dollar, it might allow those big firms, those firms that already have a presence, to acquire firms or lawyers or groups of lawyers that they might not otherwise be able to, because they might be able to offer more attractive compensation packages," said Marci Taylor, a law firm consultant and principal at Withum advisory firm.
ON THE RADAR - Harpo, an entertainment and media company founded by Oprah Winfrey, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit on Tuesday in New York Southern District Court. The suit takes aim at Professor Kellie Carter Jackson of Wellesley College and Professor Leah Wright Rigueur of Brandeis University over their podcast "Oprahdemics," a series dedicated to discussion about Winfrey and her cultural impact. The complaint accuses the defendants of misappropriating the "Oprah" mark and "O" logo in connection with the series. The suit was filed by Dorsey & Whitney. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-06787, Harpo Inc. v. Jackson et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
By Brad Kutner and Michael A. Mora |
Boies Schiller Earns Lion's Share of $667 Million Fees From Blue Cross Blue Shield MDL By Bruce Love |
For Big Law in Florida, Balancing Client Interests and Politics Is Treacherous By Dan Roe |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute read'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readAvantia CEO Discusses Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250