On-Demand
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
Law firms are not the only career path for attorneys. Many legal professionals often feel they want a more flexible career with the ability to work in different industries and practice areas. Working with a flexible legal talent provider allows you to develop a solo career while choosing engaging work to focus on and building a powerful network.
Join this webcast to hear panelists share their journeys about shifting from law firm to in-house work via a flexible legal talent provider. You will learn:
- Why lawyers typically make the switch from law firm to in-house.
- What to expect when making the move from law firm to in-house.
- The benefits of working for a flexible legal talent provider.
Speakers
 | Brian Brumfield | Host Brian has over a year of experience in the legal recruiting industry. He joined Axiom in 2022 and is currently a Manager of Talent Recruiting. Prior to joining Axiom, he spent seven years as a practicing attorney with his solo firm based in Beverly Hills with a focus on real estate and business law. Before opening his own firm, Brian had worked for the federal government as a field operations supervisor for the Department of Commerce, been a real estate broker, and practiced as a real estate and business attorney for various firms in both Los Angeles and Atlanta. Brian is a huge foodie that loves trying different exotic cuisines and is a film aficionado that enjoys a wide range of film genres. He is especially obsessed with scary movies and haunted locales.
|
 | Paula Bralow Paula is a lawyer with large NYC and NJ law firm litigation as well as SaaS start-up and F500 in-house experience in the areas of contracts/commercial transactions and general business counseling. She kicked off a solo practice in 2019 both to keep at these familiar practice areas and to embark on a new area: civil mediation (non-family). She enjoys spending time with family and friends, walking/jogging, yoga, and wordplay. |
Can't attend? You should still register! We will send out an on-demand recording after the webcast so you can participate when it's convenient for you.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
![Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/276/2024/10/Image-request_767x633pxl.jpg "Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]")
Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
4 minute read
Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 2Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 32024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 4What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 5Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
