SEC Departures Gather Steam: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 23, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
MIGHT AS WELL JUMP - We all remember that dreaded scolding from mom when we were kids: "If all your colleagues left the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, would you follow them just because 'everybody's doing it'?" The Securities and Exchange Commission has already seen a significant flow of attorneys leaving for private practice this year, and industry observers told Law.com's Bruce Love that they foresee more on the horizon. "It's certainly unusual to see more lawyers leave the SEC the year after an administration change," said one Washington-based legal recruiter on the condition of anonymity because the recruiter works closely with government lawyers looking to move into private practice. "Usually, the SEC is more settled a year after a new president and commissioner. It could speak to unease in the ranks, or it could simply be a product of market demand. SEC lawyers are hot right now." That unease could come from the very top of the agency. Chairman Gary Gensler, appointed last year by the Biden administration, is apparently making good on his mission to move the SEC to an enforcement model of broken windows, targeting more cases and more individuals, according to sources with knowledge of how the SEC operates. And this "broken windows" policy has translated into more work—and sometimes disagreements—with staff attorneys over the direction of the agency.
TECH GUT CHECK - Experts say many legal departments aren't good at harnessing the power of data. That's not exactly a revelation. But if tech-challenged in-house teams are under the impression that they still have plenty of time to figure it out, they may be sorely mistaken. "As if in-house legal departments needed another problem—explosion of technology and data only adds to their list of anxieties," Jason Winmill, managing partner of the legal consulting firm Argopoint, told Law.com's Trudy Knockless. He added: "Technology has traditionally been a bit of a weak point of legal departments. That is no longer an acceptable position for a best-in-class legal department or even an adequate legal department." A Deloitte white paper released this year put it this way: "Companies today expect more than just advice purely based on individual experience or acumen; another level of persuasion and confidence comes from advice that is supported or enhanced with objective metrics." Beyond decision-making, savvy data management is critical to mitigating legal risks, wrote Jeffrey Wolff, director of e-discovery solutions at ZyLAB, in a November blog post. While underretention of data can starve a business of the intelligence it needs to make business decisions, holding too much data and for too long can bog down discovery during litigation and expose the company to liability from data breaches, Wolff said.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Holland & Knight partner Sara Schretenthaler Staha has entered an appearance for restaurant owner and operator Ra Sushi Addison Corp. in a pending collective employment action over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The complaint was filed July 1 in Texas Northern District Court by Sanford Law Firm on behalf of individuals employed by defendant as hourly paid servers who contend that they were not paid for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Karen Gren Scholer, is 3:22-cv-01437, Mims v. Ra Sushi Addison Corp. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - General Electric was sued Monday in Connecticut District Court alleging unlawful business conduct. The lawsuit was brought by Holwell Shuster & Goldberg on behalf of Aenergy S.A. and its subsidiary Combined Cycle Power Soyo S.A. The complaint contends that GE falsely accused the plaintiffs of committing 'irregularities' under a $1.1 billion financing facility that GE Capital extended to Angola's Ministry of Finance to permit state-owned entities to pay for the plaintiffs to install GE-manufactured turbines. The plaintiffs further allege that after the false statements were made, Angola proposed transferring all of the plaintiffs' contracted work directly to GE. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 3:22-cv-01055, Aenergy, S.A. et al v. General Electric International Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Jurors Fell Apart: How 'Physical and Emotional' Pressures Derailed Jury Deliberations in Major Trial By Amanda Bronstad |
As Public Comment Period Winds Down, Debate Heats Up Over ABA Proposal to Make LSAT Optional By Christine Charnosky |
Judge Signals Support for DOJ in Challenge to Idaho Abortion Ban By Andrew Goudsward |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250