Happy Friday from Avalon and Brad, and welcome to another round-up of the week’s news from and about the judicial bench. This week we heard from an outgoing circuit judge on her thoughts on mandatory retirement ages for judges. Spoiler alert, she supports them. We’ve also got some thoughts from law professors on Judge Jerry Smith’s recent dissental raising concerns over his colleagues abusing non-publication rules. One court watcher says while there are checks in place to discourage judges from manipulating publication to avoid review of a decision, it could become more prevalent as courts become more polarized.
Please reach out to us via [email protected] or [email protected] with any tips or feedback. Follow us on Twitter: @AvalonZoppo and @BradKutner.
Judge Diane Wood of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
This Judge Supports Mandatory Retirement Ages
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
