Will Judicial Polarization Lead to More Strategic 'Unpublished' Opinions?: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 29, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Court Administration
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
UNPOPULAR OPINIONS - Pretty sneaky, sis. Concerns about judges abusing unpublished opinions are in the spotlight following a dissental from Judge Jerry Smith last week. The practice is likely rare, but one expert told Law.com's Avalon Zoppo that, as courts become more politically polarized, the risk of judges strategically (and nefariously) using nonbinding, unpublished opinions to avoid en banc review could increase. "All Republican or all Democrat panels may be more tempted to do things to protect decisions from disagreeing colleagues," said Merritt McAlister, a University of Florida law professor. Because unpublished opinions aren't precedential and don't typically get reviewed by full courts, some court-watchers have expressed worry that panels could use them to get their desired outcome in a particular case without making changes to how future similar appeals are decided. Smith, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, accused his colleagues of doing just that: not publishing a decision that paused an airline's COVID-19 vaccine policy to prevent review by the full court. "How could it be that a key component of the law governing federal courts' 'awesome power' to order litigants around does not 'in any way interest persons other than the parties to [this] case'?" Smith wrote.
MORE MIAMI MOVEMENT - Big Law is apparently still looking to party in the city where the heat is on. A second quarter survey of large law firms from ALM Intelligence and LawVision, which polled the 500 largest firms in the U.S., found that 38% of respondents had their eyes set on Miami, Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports. Only the greater New York region, with 43% of respondents, was selected more frequently. And the surge of firms in Miami may not be over. "Because people are moving there, and some of the private equity decision-makers are moving to Florida, firms are essentially following their clients to South Florida," said Lisa Smith, a principal at Fairfax Associates. Smith added that Miami may be trending higher still because, compared with major markets at least, it's relatively untapped.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Steven K. Ludwig and Brian McGinnis of Fox Rothschild have entered appearances for Slipstream IT LLC in a pending trade secret lawsuit. The case, filed July 5 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Fisher & Phillips and Seyfarth Shaw on behalf of health and research company IQVIA Holdings, centers on allegations that Slipstream and its founders misappropriated proprietary information regarding IQVIA's customers, prospective customers and its business transactions. Co-defendant Erica Breskin is represented by Burns White. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Juan R. Sanchez, is 2:22-cv-02610, IQVIA Inc. v. Breskin et al. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Moderna sued Pfizer and vaccine partner BioNTech on Friday for patent infringement in connection with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. The court case, brought by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in Massachusetts District Court, claims that the defendants are infringing patents related to mRNA vaccine technology. In the complaint, Moderna states that it 'refrained from asserting its patents earlier so as not to distract from efforts to bring the pandemic to an end as quickly as possible.' Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-11378, ModernaTX, Inc. et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'The Worst Day of My Legal Career': As One of Alex Jones's Lawyers Takes the Stand, the Other Pleads the 5th By Emily Cousins |
'There Is Going to Be Pushback': Personal Injury Lawyers Fire Back at Critic Over Pricing and Practices By Emily Cousins |
In First-Impression Case, Judge Ordered to Reconsider Former MIT Student's Request to Proceed Anonymously in Title IX Suit By Allison Dunn |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
Judge Cannon Says She Has No Relationship With Trump and Won't Step Down From Attempted Assassination Case
State, Federal Courts in North Carolina Announce Reopening Dates Following Hurricane Helene
Many Judges Earn Less Than Lawyers: Texas Judiciary Asks for 30% Raise
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Media Law Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump and Carr’s FCC
- 2Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 3Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 4Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 5People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250