Sexual Harassment Persists in Law Firm Culture: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 02, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
'WHAT ARE THEY ALLOWING?' - Law firm efforts to create an equitable and safe environment for female attorneys have made progress over the last 30 years, especially since the #MeToo movement took root. But, as Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, interviews with female attorneys and a wide-ranging survey on the subject show that sexual harassment is still a daily struggle for many. The industry shift to remote work didn't halt harassment in the workplace, either. Other forms of harassment, such as bullying and inappropriate comments, may have actually flourished during the pandemic due to one-on-one interactions on video chats, said Cory Amron, a founder of the advocacy group Women Lawyers on Guard (WLG). A 2020 WLG survey highlighted that significant barriers to progress remain, allowing harassment to run rampant in the legal profession. These barriers to progress include a lack of reporting for fear of retribution, power dynamics between the harasser and harassed that put the latter in untenable positions, and workplace cultures that, while they may discourage the behavior, lack teeth to adequately enforce consequences. "Firms have to look at their cultures," said one female attorney, who asked not to be named in order to speak freely. "What are they fostering, what are they allowing? What are you allowing clients to do and say just because they may at some point give you some business and some money? Is that more important than the health [of the firm's attorneys]?"
IT PAYS TO KNOW PEOPLE - Turns out you don't have to keep working for the SEC to get paid by the SEC. The agency's widely hailed whistleblower program has paid millions in recent years to former SEC lawyers who have come to dominate the market for representing tipsters seeking payouts through the program, a new study found. As Law.com's Andrew Goudsward reports, an analysis by Alexander Platt, an associate professor at the University of Kansas Law School, found that whistleblowers who retained counsel received substantially higher awards on average than those without, and of those who hired lawyers, a small group of repeat players—many of whom once worked at the SEC—was by far the most successful. The study estimated that a quarter of the total award payouts the SEC issued from the inception of the whistleblower program in 2011 through 2020 went to clients of lawyers who formerly worked at the agency. Using a standard 30-40% contingency fee, Platt estimated that the SEC paid out between $53 million and $70 million to its own alumni. Repeat SEC whistleblower attorneys earned an average of $10.3 million in awards for their clients, compared with just under $6 million for whistleblowers counseled by lawyers who hadn't previously secured an SEC payout, according to the analysis.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Derek T. Rollins of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart has entered an appearance for Sysco New Mexico in a labor grievance pertaining to COVID-19 work reductions. The case, filed July 14 by Youtz & Valdez on behalf of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 492, seeks to enforce an arbitration award requiring the defendant to pay all employees for a minimum 40-hour work week for the period from March 2020 to Dec. 2020. The suit, filed in New Mexico District Court, claims that Sysco New Mexico has refused to comply with the Aug. 2021 award. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jerry H. Ritter, is 1:22-cv-00520, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Sysco New Mexico, LLC. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Springbig, a cannabis platform for dispensaries and brands, was hit with a lawsuit Thursday in Florida Southern District Court over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The suit was brought by attorney Mark J. Beutler on behalf of Jenifer Zduncyk. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 9:22-cv-81350, Zduncyk v. Springbig, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Bayer Scores 5th Consecutive Defense Verdict Over Monsanto's Roundup By Amanda Bronstad |
Appeals Court: Massachusetts—Not Minnesota—Law Applies to Legal Malpractice Claim Over Unreleased Prince Songs By Colleen Murphy |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250