How Will Law Firms Enforce Their Office Returns in the Fall?: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 13, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
IMPERFECT ATTENDANCE - Behold! The leaves are turning and the Ritual Hand-Wringing Over Office Returns has commenced! As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, law firm leaders, like their corporate peers, are aiming to increase the number of lawyers and staff in the office during the upcoming fall and winter months, seeking to maximize all the training and collaboration benefits that (allegedly) come with it. But they're still struggling to enforce in-office work policies and afraid of the reputational hazards if they do, industry observers say. Meanwhile, many firms are struggling to get partners to buy into office returns, let alone more junior attorneys and staff members. Stephanie Biderman, a partner with legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa, told Smith that the lure of mentorship and training for associates is gone if the partnership isn't there. And if that lure isn't there, what's the motivation for the associates to come in? "If people are being productive at home, firms don't want to lose those productive people," she said of attorneys who are hesitant to come back and also doing their job well. "Firms are trying to tow that middle ground of culture, training and mentorship, but they are also people and want to be nice and be flexible. In my mind, if the partners are not in, I think it is very hard to accomplish most of the goals achieved by having people in the office."
YOU DOWN WITH ESG? - GCs may not have much of a choice but to take the reins of their companies' ESG programs. But luckily, many of them seem fairly jazzed about these roles, which build off their intricate knowledge of the regulatory environment and the relationships many have established across their companies, Law.com's Trudy Knockless reports. "It also has a social and media and communications and branding component," said PJ Harari, a partner of in-house recruiting at Major, Lindsey & Africa. "It has an environmental component, which might deal with operations and efficiencies, supply chain issues. Those are all within the control of different departments, but legal brings people together." A survey of 79 in-house lawyers released in May by Corporate Counsel and Morrison & Foerster found that 54% of legal departments now have responsibility for leading environmental, social and governance strategy. Many legal chiefs say they welcome the new duties, despite the significant challenges that go with them. As John Albright, chief legal and compliance officer of Chicago-based insurance brokerage HUB International, put it: "ESG is of interest to your employees. It's of interest to your customers. It's of interest to your investors."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ -Barry Y. Freeman of Roetzel & Andress has entered an appearance for Falcons Management Georgia, a TGI Fridays restaurant operator, in a pending employment class action. The suit, filed July 11 in Ohio Southern District Court by Nilges Draher LLC, claims that the defendant improperly paid its servers the 'tipped minimum wage,' while requiring servers to perform non-tip producing work. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Walter H. Rice, is 3:22-cv-00182, Olade v. Falcons Management Georgia >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - BuzzFeed was hit with a digital privacy class action on Monday in Illinois Northern District Court. The suit, brought by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise and Bailey & Glasser, pursues claims under the Video Privacy Protection Act on behalf of individuals whose personal information was allegedly shared with Facebook through a tracking pixel on the defendant's Huffington Post website. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:22-cv-04927, Wright v. BuzzFeed Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Calling Judge 'Nit-Picky,' Sidney Powell Challenges Her 'Kraken' Lawsuit Sanctions By Avalon Zoppo |
The 'Longest', 'Most Emotional' Experience: Attorneys Mark Final Plan Approval in Boy Scouts Case By Amanda Bronstad |
'I Feel Like I've Ruined My Life': A Few Weeks Into the Semester, Some Law Students Consider Quitting By Christine Charnosky |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250