![](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2022/09/layoffs-767x633.jpg)
Snap's Legal Cuts Likely Not Sign of Carnage to Come, Recruiters Say
"Companies need their in-house lawyers. ... So somebody is going to have to do the work—whether it's inside or outside," legal recruiter John Gilmore said.
September 14, 2022 at 02:38 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Experts on the in-house legal market say they don't think the recent deep layoffs at Snap, which included prominent members of the legal team, are a sign of things to come at other tech companies.
They cite myriad reasons, including that, at startups especially, legal teams tend to be so small that cuts there don't move the expense needle. Then there's the reality that much of what a legal department does is essential, in good times or bad, and as a result cuts there could force companies to farm out more work to pricey outside counsel.
"Companies need their in-house lawyers," said John Gilmore, founder and managing partner of the legal recruiting firm BarkerGilmore. "You can't live without the corporate governance or litigation or securities or labor and employment or whatever the specialized lawyer is. So somebody is going to have to do the work—whether it's inside or outside."
Law.com reported last week that at least a half dozen in-house lawyers and other legal team members were swept up in a more than 1,200-person layoff at Snap, the Santa Monica, California-based parent of Snapchat. They included a Seattle-based associate general counsel who had joined the company behind a week before she got the pink slip.
In August, Law.com reported that Notarize—a Boston-based remote notarization tech company that laid off about 25% of its 450-person workforce in June, has shrunk its more than 60-person legal department down to 17 over the past year.
Legal-market experts say that while similar examples might pop up in the future, they say legal departments generally will be much more likely to put the brakes on new hires than cut attorneys already on payroll.
Legal recruiters say there is an air of caution at tech companies as they plot 2023 budgets, but they say legal departments rarely are in the crosshairs for cost-cutting.
Legal ops teams—which help departments maximize efficiency and effectiveness—are critical in lean times to help companies make the most of the staff they already have, said Stephanie Corey, CEO of the legal ops consulting firm UpLevel Ops.
"We're hopeful that, as during the pandemic, GCs continue to recognize the necessity of legal ops in order to scale without budget and head count increases," she said.
Sumi Trombley, a senior consultant of UpLevel Ops, added: "Where the pandemic pushed legal departments to adopt baseline technology such as e-signature, the renewed focus on cost-efficiency will challenge legal departments to focus on process and evaluate what they should and should not be undertaking as a department with the resources they have."
Gilmore said the tech companies that might be most vulnerable to layoffs are those highly reliant on selling digital advertising—a sector that has seen a precipitous dropoff.
Citing that trend, the investment firm Barclays this summer cut its stock price outlook for four advertising-dependent tech stalwarts—Snap, Meta, Alphabet and Pinterest.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24 Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/01/Snapchat-App-004-767x633.jpg)
![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Inside Track: Cooley's Modest Proposal to Make Executives Safer Inside Track: Cooley's Modest Proposal to Make Executives Safer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/06/70/62de25314643aee1f6d76982802e/2024-12-9-police-responding-to-brian-thompson-shooting-421471145-bloomberg-640x640-yuki-iwamura.jpg)
Inside Track: Cooley's Modest Proposal to Make Executives Safer
![Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6a/c0/2a90c5cb477389be51e3152e80f4/pierre-gentin-767x633-1.jpg)
Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
Trending Stories
- 1Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024
- 2January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 3'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 4Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 5Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250