The Good News and Bad News About Female GC Pay: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 20, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
'A LONG WAY TO GO' - The top five female legal chiefs in 2021 collected $26.8 million in total cash comp, which averages to $5.4 million, an increase of 27% over 2020's average of $4.2 million. As Law.com's Trudy Knockless reports, the rising pay reflects the intensely competitive market to hire and retain general counsel, said Deborah Ben-Canaan, a partner and senior practice leader of in-house counsel recruiting at Major, Lindsey & Africa Global. But not all the compensation news for female GCs was bright. Nine of the 20 highest-paid GCs on last year's overall list of highest-paid GCs were women, an encouraging indicator that the stubborn gender pay gap might finally be closing. But the number of women on this year's top 20 fell to five. "I'm disappointed. We seemed to be improving last year, but now we've hit a huge drop-off," Katherine Loanzon, managing director at Kinney Recruiting in New York, said in July. "The pandemic may have been a factor as it caused a lot of female executives to have to come to terms with balancing the family versus their professional responsibilities." She added, "But a larger conversation should be, 'How are these companies supporting women in these positions?' It just shows that corporate America still has a long way to go."
FUTURE TENSE - While the final quarter is still on the horizon and economic uncertainty is lingering, law firm performance for 2022 is significantly "baked in" at this point, and it would take a major shake-up to alter course, some industry observers say. But what does 2023 have in store? As Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, that answer is, uh… not quite done baking. Uncertainty about whether the deal market will rebound and unknowns such as the U.S. midterm elections and the war in Ukraine, along with stubbornly-persistent inflation, could all shape the road ahead. Demand and profits are down this year, but that was expected. Even before much of the geopolitical and macroeconomic turmoil kicked in, law firms knew their 2021 benchmarks were going to be tough to top. And a majority of firms still reported better-than-anticipated performance and profitability after the start of the year, according to a recent ALM/LawVision Flash Survey. In the context of the past three years, too, the industry has seen 2.3% average annual demand growth since halfway through 2019, according to Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group. "Generally firms have been concerned, but up until the half-year point, things seemed to be holding up quite well," said Tony Williams, a London-based principal at Jomati Consultants. But things get significantly blurrier when trying to project out through next year. David Foltyn, CEO of Honigman, said the lingering question for his firm on this year's performance is whether it will be more like 2019, 2020 or 2021—all of which included gains. However, "the whole law world is wondering about 2023," he said.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Williams & Connolly partners Thomas H.L. Selby and David Berl are defending Pfizer in a pending patent lawsuit over Paxlovid, Pfizer's high-profile treatment for COVID-19. The case, filed June 21 in Massachusetts District Court by Foley Hoag on behalf of Enanta Pharmaceuticals, contends that Paxlovid contains a chemical compound patented by Enanta. Pfizer is also represented by McCarter & English. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Denise J. Casper, is 1:22-cv-10967, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Co-Diagnostics, the maker of the Logix Smart COVID-19 detection system, and members of its board of directors were hit with a securities class action on Monday in New York Southern District Court. The suit, which comes on the heels of an August 11 press release announcing that the company's quarterly revenue had declined by nearly 82% from the same quarter in 2021, accuses the company of failing to disclose that demand for the Logix test had plummeted. The suit was filed by Pomerantz LLP. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-07988, Lee v. Co-Diagnostics Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Turning a Shield Into a Sword? Johnson & Johnson Accused of Abusing Bankruptcy in Talc Litigation By Amanda Bronstad |
Staff Layoffs at Fish & Richardson as Secretary Roles 'Transition' By Justin Henry |
DC Circuit Questions if State AGs Waited Too Long to Sue Meta for Alleged Antitrust Violations By AValon Zoppo |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Legaltech Rundown: LexisNexis Releases Lexis+ AI Mobile App, Hotshot Launches New M&A Training Simulation, and More
- 3Perkins Coie Boasts Diverse Partner Class
- 4NY Judge Indefinitely Delays Sentencing in Trump Hush Money Case
- 5US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250