Why Big Law Will Never Solve Its Retention Problem: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 22, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
POWER GRAB - At last, law firms can finally take a breath, regroup and stop pretending to care about things like employee wellbeing and job satisfaction. While the past few years have seen attorneys demand high pay and increased flexibility in exchange for little more than historic production and profits, the tables are finally turning and firm leaders are getting what they've craved so desperately these past few years: the upper hand on their attorneys and staff. For all the talk of "progress" and "evolution" (not to mention "wellness" and "empathy") in the legal industry over the past few years, the conversation has now turned to "leverage." It seems that some law firm leaders were simply been biding their time until they could reassert their dominance. And, as we explore in the latest Law.com Trendspotter column, therein lies the key to Big Law's eternal struggle: for all the recent hand-wringing about professional development and culture, this industry's retention methods have always relied less on job satisfaction and wellbeing than on fear and uncertainty. What do you think? Has Big Law learned any lasting lessons about talent retention or is it about to use its regained leverage to squash what it views as an uprising by lawyers who have had it too good for too long? Let me know at [email protected].
LAND OF CONFUSION - There are less than 200 ABA-accredited law schools in the U.S., but apparently not enough law school names to go around. As Law.com's Christine Charnosky reports, the result is a number of law schools who share very similar monikers, which can lead to mix-ups, misidentifications, misattributions—and sometimes even litigation. The most recent example of name sameness involves two Pennsylvania law schools: one at Duquesne University and one at Drexel University, both of which are now named after prominent plaintiffs lawyer Tom Kline, who donated $50 million to each institution. Following the news in September that Duquesne's law school would be renamed the Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University., Daniel M. Filler, law dean at Drexel (which became the Thomas R. Kline School of Law in 2014) seemed to anticipate their would be questions. "Tom has made clear his steadfast commitment to the future of this law school," Filler wrote to students last week. "I know he looks forward to continuing the many advancements that Drexel's Kline School of Law has made over the last several years, and I'm happy to report we are in significant conversations with Tom right now about bolstering his already generous support of our law school."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ -John E. Flaherty and Cynthia S. Betz of McCarter & English have entered appearances for Royal Western Computer Inc., Jong S. Lim and Tomorrow Pos Inc. in a pending trade secret and copyright infringement lawsuit. The complaint, filed July 28 in New Jersey District Court by Schenck, Price, Smith & King on behalf of United Merchant Services and Bluu Inc., accuses the defendants of misappropriating customer lists and other confidential information in order to sell third-party products without the plaintiffs' knowledge. The defendants are also targeted for allegedly marketing competing Rainbow POS software while blocking the plaintiffs from replacing it with United Merchant's Royal Touch software. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katharine S. Hayden, is 2:22-cv-04791, United Merchant Services, Inc et al v. Royal Western Computer, Inc et al. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - MGM Resorts International was hit with a class action Wednesday in Mississippi Southern District Court on behalf of slot players who allege that the defendant's 'no-change' policy unfairly rounds down cash-outs to the nearest dollar. The lawsuit, filed by Sternberg, Naccari & White and Martzell Bickford & Centola, accuses MGM of siphoning millions of dollars from players by making it more difficult for visitors to recoup exact change. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:22-cv-00258, Scherer v. MGM Resorts International. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'Red Herring': 11th Circuit Ravages Trump's Claims He Declassified Secret Docs By Brad Kutner |
Attorney Suspended for Forging Client's Signature on Settlement Check By Marianna Wharry |
Julie Rikelman, Attorney Who Defended Abortion at Supreme Court, Lambasted by Republicans in Confirmation Hearing By Brad Kutner |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRed Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
5 minute readBaker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
2 minute readStars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
6 minute readLaw Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250