Big Law, Generation Z, and The Legal Profession — A Conversation With Joshua Lenon of Clio
As part of our series on Generation Z and the legal profession, we recently met with Joshua Lenon, lawyer-in-residence at Clio, an international legal software company. Lenon has worked extensively to educate lawyers on technology's capability to enhance their practice, while also teaching tech companies about the unique needs of the legal system. He's a Gen Xer with powerful insights into Gen Z recruiting and the legal community in general.How to Make It: Gen Z and the Legal Profession, Part 1 — Where's the @#$%&! Road Map to Leadership?
There is no one-size-fits-all path to partner anymore.
September 27, 2022 at 01:57 PM
5 minute read
How I Made ItJoshua Lenon, "lawyer-in-residence" for Clio, a legal software company.
I'm a bit of a jack-of-all-trades, so I'm often down a rabbit hole researching a question on behalf of our product team or our sales team, who are like "this law firm does what?"
But then I'm also acting as an educational evangelist, really talking about the research that we do, the lessons that I have learned, the things that have been taught to me by customers and lawyers who are generous enough to share their time and it's creating what I hope is a very virtuous cycle between the legal profession and legal technology to transparently look at how we can be helping each other in a win-win environment.
Joshua Lenon Interview – Part 1
Where's the Road Map?
Obviously, there's a road map somewhere of how to get from associate to partner to leadership, but it's not shared with the associates.
It's not shared, and they're not building supports along the way on that path: guideposts, mentorship, opportunities. In the past it's been, hopefully, you find a partner that likes you, that has time to answer questions, you have your own network that you can start turning into a book of business, because you're not going to be getting business from a partner. That's their origination fee, that's their client, and so there's always been this kind of struggle where you're almost intentionally kept in the dark due to the perverse incentives, the lack of sharing in law firms. "If I don't share, I make more money," and instead it's led to this situation, and it became especially problematic about five years ago where a lot of these bigger law firms realized they had driven away the people who are going to keep the law firm going for the next five to 10 years.
Suddenly, there just weren't enough partners billing hours. They're nearing retirement age, their clients are transitioning to other firms, and if they wanted the law firm to continue and to support the existing partners, they needed to bring people in quick, and they needed those people to be equity partners.
We see a lot of laterals in Big Law because of that realization. "We're just going to grab partners from other firms and do whatever it takes to keep our law firm going because we didn't plan for generational succession."
Not-So Best Practices
Where do you see law firms holding onto established ways of doing business that are harming them?
We know, because of the sharing of Generation Z, that they are a lot more open to what has worked for their peers. Law firms, if they're looking to really court this new generation, need to be able to demonstrate a path to success for their new hires. And so rather than just talking about your starting salary, which is important, but also talk about what will be the outcomes of the work. What will be the career milestones that should be expected when you succeed? And what's the path that the law firm is setting up to get that new hire to those milestones?
Often a law firm will present the starting point: Here's your salary and then this brass ring at the end: partnership. But they don't really talk about what the firm's going to do to move the new hire from starting position to brass ring. Instead, there's always been this kind of "up or out" mentality. You either figure out how to move up, or you exit the law firm.
What suggestions would you have for changes that these law firms need to make?
First of all, they do need to recognize there's not a one-size-fits-all path to partner anymore. And we know this in a whole variety of different situations, most of which are about equity. For example, the dearth of female and people of color partners in larger law firms, even though there is an incredibly large percentage of those people entering the legal profession. Over half the law students right now are women and have been for a long time, yet their rise to partnership has been stymied because of these past approaches. We need to bring in flexibility.
For more career advancement advice and success stories, check out the "How I Made It" Q&A and "How to Make It" series on Law.com.
ALM's Professionals Network on LinkedIn, Advancing Future Leaders. We are excited about this pivotal group. Click here to join.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
How I Made Practice Group Leader: 'It’s a Job About People, First and Foremost,' Says Alexander Lees of Milbank
How I Made Partner: 'Your Coworkers Are One of the Most Valuable Assets You Have,' Says Laurel Roglen of Ballard Spahr
Trending Stories
- 1Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 2Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 3Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 4Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 5Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250