How to Make It: Gen Z and the Legal Profession, Part 1 — Where's the @#$%&! Road Map to Leadership?
There is no one-size-fits-all path to partner anymore.
September 27, 2022 at 01:57 PM
5 minute read
How I Made ItBig Law, Generation Z, and The Legal Profession — A Conversation With Joshua Lenon of Clio
As part of our series on Generation Z and the legal profession, we recently met with Joshua Lenon, lawyer-in-residence at Clio, an international legal software company. Lenon has worked extensively to educate lawyers on technology's capability to enhance their practice, while also teaching tech companies about the unique needs of the legal system. He's a Gen Xer with powerful insights into Gen Z recruiting and the legal community in general.
Joshua Lenon, "lawyer-in-residence" for Clio, a legal software company.
I'm a bit of a jack-of-all-trades, so I'm often down a rabbit hole researching a question on behalf of our product team or our sales team, who are like "this law firm does what?"
But then I'm also acting as an educational evangelist, really talking about the research that we do, the lessons that I have learned, the things that have been taught to me by customers and lawyers who are generous enough to share their time and it's creating what I hope is a very virtuous cycle between the legal profession and legal technology to transparently look at how we can be helping each other in a win-win environment.
Joshua Lenon Interview – Part 1
Where's the Road Map?
Obviously, there's a road map somewhere of how to get from associate to partner to leadership, but it's not shared with the associates.
It's not shared, and they're not building supports along the way on that path: guideposts, mentorship, opportunities. In the past it's been, hopefully, you find a partner that likes you, that has time to answer questions, you have your own network that you can start turning into a book of business, because you're not going to be getting business from a partner. That's their origination fee, that's their client, and so there's always been this kind of struggle where you're almost intentionally kept in the dark due to the perverse incentives, the lack of sharing in law firms. "If I don't share, I make more money," and instead it's led to this situation, and it became especially problematic about five years ago where a lot of these bigger law firms realized they had driven away the people who are going to keep the law firm going for the next five to 10 years.
Suddenly, there just weren't enough partners billing hours. They're nearing retirement age, their clients are transitioning to other firms, and if they wanted the law firm to continue and to support the existing partners, they needed to bring people in quick, and they needed those people to be equity partners.
We see a lot of laterals in Big Law because of that realization. "We're just going to grab partners from other firms and do whatever it takes to keep our law firm going because we didn't plan for generational succession."
Not-So Best Practices
Where do you see law firms holding onto established ways of doing business that are harming them?
We know, because of the sharing of Generation Z, that they are a lot more open to what has worked for their peers. Law firms, if they're looking to really court this new generation, need to be able to demonstrate a path to success for their new hires. And so rather than just talking about your starting salary, which is important, but also talk about what will be the outcomes of the work. What will be the career milestones that should be expected when you succeed? And what's the path that the law firm is setting up to get that new hire to those milestones?
Often a law firm will present the starting point: Here's your salary and then this brass ring at the end: partnership. But they don't really talk about what the firm's going to do to move the new hire from starting position to brass ring. Instead, there's always been this kind of "up or out" mentality. You either figure out how to move up, or you exit the law firm.
What suggestions would you have for changes that these law firms need to make?
First of all, they do need to recognize there's not a one-size-fits-all path to partner anymore. And we know this in a whole variety of different situations, most of which are about equity. For example, the dearth of female and people of color partners in larger law firms, even though there is an incredibly large percentage of those people entering the legal profession. Over half the law students right now are women and have been for a long time, yet their rise to partnership has been stymied because of these past approaches. We need to bring in flexibility.
For more career advancement advice and success stories, check out the "How I Made It" Q&A and "How to Make It" series on Law.com.
ALM's Professionals Network on LinkedIn, Advancing Future Leaders. We are excited about this pivotal group. Click here to join.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'Leaders Must Be Good Listeners,' Says Dan Summerlin of Woods Rogers
How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'When the Firm Needs Something Done, Raise Your Hand,' Says Eric Kennedy of Buchalter
How I Made Partner: 'Persevere Through the Challenging Times,' Says Jennifer Daglio of Hunton Andrews Kurth
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250