How to Make It: Gen Z and the Legal Profession, Part 4 — Retaining Talent: How Big Law, Young Lawyers, and Legal Tech Come Together
If you're not doing right by your lawyers, there's never been a better time to open your own law firm.
September 27, 2022 at 03:33 PM
5 minute read
How I Made ItBig Law, Generation Z, and Legal Technology — A Conversation With Joshua Lenon of Clio
Joshua Lenon Interview — Part 4
How do Big Law, new young lawyers, and improvements in legal technology all come together? Is there a Venn diagram showing where they meet?
I absolutely think there is. It's cliché, but oftentimes when there's a technology issue, we see the stereotype of the older lawyer asking the younger lawyer how to do these things. But a lot of the improvements that can be made in law firms and the provision of legal services are things that have been adopted by other businesses, by other industries, by the clients that these law firms are servicing. They are a common everyday experience for younger lawyers.
An example would be booking an appointment with a professional online. I can book an appointment with my doctor via their website. Same with a dentist. Same with an accountant, right? But a lot of law firms don't give that agency to the client.
Younger lawyers who are utilizing these changes in client experience are better positioned in a law firm to spot these opportunities and help position them in a way that is both in the interest of the client and the law firm. I want to stress that second one because legal technology is a bit unique in that we really do have to balance several duties. The duty to the client, the duty as an officer of the court, the duty as an advocate to the rule of law, being a partner within a law firm, and the unique legal responsibility of partners to each other that don't always exist in other businesses. Law firms have to balance all of that, and legal technology allows these younger lawyers with their lived experience and their expertise to bring the right technology together and help the partners enable them for existing clients and existing legal services.
So the Venn diagram is very much overlapping between those three things. But it will take buy-in from all sides on how to bring that together.
At Clio, we've seen that as we work with law firms, we have to engage a whole variety of stakeholders within the law firm itself to make sure we're the right fit. For example, we have a chat bot feature built right into Clio manager, and so if you're a Gen Z lawyer and you've got a question about a feature, you can just type a quick chat bot question. It'll pull up a video or an article, or ask if you want to speak to a customer representative. And that's very much a Gen Z self-help workflow.
Whereas for lawyers of a different generation, their first response is "I'm going to call somebody," and that's why we have an 800 number and live support.
How much of this needs to be lawyer to lawyer? Is there a "you can't understand what I mean" mentality coming from older attorneys?
It does exist, but I don't think it's as widespread as everybody thinks.
Does legal technology need to enter a law firm via a lawyer? Yes, 100% yes, but that's in part the unique structure of law firms, where the final veto is always the lawyer.
If the managing partner says no, there's no way around that. And the junior attorneys and the IT administrators and the office managers all ultimately answer to the law firm partners, right? That unique structure means that the lawyers always have to be both an advocate and an adopter of legal technology.
Now, is it the case that they can only learn from lawyers? I think the answer to that is 100% "No." So legal tech has to come through the lawyers, but they don't have to learn from lawyers. I think one of Clio's amazing insights is that the legal profession can learn from outside best practices, but often needs the examples to be couched in something that they understand.
What else is important to know that we don't always talk about?
I think one of the things that we don't always talk about when it comes to law firms and retaining talent is how easy it is to open a law firm.
If you're not doing right by your lawyers, there's never been a better time to open your own law firm. If you think about it, you don't have to have an office anymore. You can start your law firm without having real estate. You don't have to invest in a huge amount of technology. A really difficult part for young law firms was they would bootstrap and then once things became too much then they would invest in technology. Now I can start my practice management for like 60 bucks as opposed to: go out and hire an IT guy, buy a server, have a place to put that server, then go to somebody like Thomson Reuters and pay them $20,000 for software that's already out of date and doesn't come with support. So, opening a law firm in the past was very capital-intensive, and opening a law firm now is a weekend project.
So, if you're really concerned about the generational health of your law firm, making sure that the law firm continues to service clients for the entirety of their legal needs, that we're building a lasting foundation that will benefit the rising lawyers, as well as the existing partners well into the future, then I need to understand that if I'm not doing right by my employees, they can just go and do right by themselves.
For more career advancement advice and success stories, check out the "How I Made It" Q&A and "How to Make It" series on Law.com.
ALM's Professionals Network on LinkedIn, Advancing Future Leaders. We are excited about this pivotal group. Click here to join.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It's Essential to Have a Clear Vision,' Says Matthew Carey of Marshall Gerstein
How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Be a Good Partner and Colleague,' Says Logan Drew of Robins Kaplan
How the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250