M&A Slowdown Has Law Firms Making Personnel Decisions: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 27, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
NO BIG DEAL? - M&A is down, but the firms leaning heavily into corporate work have not been publicly sounding any alarms. While there have been some layoffs reported, for the most part, the firms have stuck with what they have talent-wise and are still closing some large deals and a few SPACs, while maintaining a decent volume of private equity work. But, as Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, the reality of 2022 is that things aren't completely peachy. Banks are lowering their fee estimates based on lack of work and announcing layoffs. Pandemic-era discounts on legal fees are still in play, knocking down profitability. Major corporations are announcing hiring freezes and/or layoffs. Finally, the more data that comes in on M&A performance thus far in 2022, the more clear it is that the slowdown is more than a speed bump for Big Law's perpetual charge forward. As one Am Law 10 firm partner put it, many firms that lean heavily into corporate work are doing some "recalibrating" of their personnel, ushering out underperforming partners and taking a closer look at associate hours and even the willingness of attorneys to be in the office when looking at who should stay and who, perhaps, should go.
ADDITION BY SUBTRACTION - With news that EY is making good on its promise to ditch its audit business, the likelihood has dramatically increased that it will deepen its legal services offerings and compete toe-to-toe with law firms, Law.com's Bruce Love reports. Senior leaders in Big Law are split on what this means for the competitive landscape, and just how much of a threat are EY and its ilk. EY raised the idea in May, and by early September the accounting firm confirmed it was moving ahead with a worldwide partner vote to spin off its advisory services—which includes its legal services—from its audit business. Dentons global CEO Joe Andrew said there is "no question" that by potentially separating legal services from its auditing business, EY would "have an easier road" to market against law firms. Andrew believes the Big Four's biggest asset when it comes to entering legal services is their track record and prowess breaking down business problems to their component parts, identifying and building technological solutions to those problems, and selling them as a service. But Philip West, a tax partner and former chair of Steptoe & Johnson, has already gone head-to-head with the Big Four for decades and said he believes "law firms are equipped to deal with the competition." While he said there are "some excellent practitioners" at the Big Four, there are also a lot of other practitioners who "don't necessarily have the experience or knowledge in the areas that clients are needing."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ -Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and OMERS Infrastructure have agreed to sell each of their respective 33.33% indirect stakes in Chicago skyway toll operator Skyway Concession Co. to Atlas Arteria Ltd. for an equity value of approximately $2 billion. The transaction, announced Sept. 12, is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2022. Financial terms were not disclosed. Canada Pension Plan is represented by a Latham & Watkins team led by Houston-based partner Justin Stolte. Counsel information for Atlas Arteria was not immediately available. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - McGraw-Hill, an online education company focused on the sciences, was slapped with a breach-of-contract lawsuit on Monday in California Northern District Court. The suit, filed by Sideman & Bancroft on behalf of three professors, accuses the defendant of breaching the terms of a settlement agreement which the parties entered to resolve claims of copyright infringement. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 3:22-cv-05475, Insel et al. v. McGraw Hill LLC et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'A Legion of Lady Lawyers' to Gather in DC to Support Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson By Cedra Mayfield |
Trump Organization Adds Impeachment Counsel to Defense Team for Manhattan DA Case By Justin Henry |
Bobbi Liebenberg Talks Class Action Woes, Gender Equity and the Challenges of E-Discovery By Christine Schiffner |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250