Career Perspective: How 2 Executives Found Their Way to Legal Tech Success
With legal technology spending increasing 8 percent this year at many large firms, career opportunities are numerous. Two executives share their journey.
September 28, 2022 at 12:06 PM
4 minute read
Legal ServicesWith spending on legal technology increasing by 8 percent at the nation's largest law firms this year, seasoned legal leaders and even younger associates looking to start in this field might view legal tech as a viable career path.
While legal tech might conjure visions of IT managers working to ensure networks and infrastructure are updated, finding a meaningful way to a legal tech career can take many paths. Katie DeBord started her career in the CIA before becoming a litigation partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner. From there, she jumped to become the firm's global chief innovation officer overseeing its tech decisions, but still able to connect to her clients and remain a trusted advisor.
"I loved creating successful outcomes for my clients," says DeBord, now Vice President of Product Strategy at DISCO.
From Litigation to Legal Tech
DeBord's work in legal technology and overseeing innovation has resulted in a multitude of payoffs for her clients – from profitability improvement and decreased transaction cycle times to improved litigation outcomes through data and analytics. All valuable boosts, in many ways.
"If you aren't figuring out how to put people on the right work and deploy technology to do the right work, your margins are not going to be good," says DeBord.
Throughout her career, DeBord has seen the evolution of the field. It "has matured enough where the legal tech industry is doing amazing things, and we've just seen the beginning of it," says DeBord. She adds that advances in technologies such as artificial intelligence are only now making their way into the day-to-day business of the law.
From DeBord's perspective, law firms have come a long way themselves when it comes to their knowledge of technology such as AI.
"Partners are starting to understand that it really does matter what technology you use," says DeBord. "I think the awareness of that is going to continue to grow."
Legal Tech Without the Law Degree
For others like Kristin Zmrhal, a career path in legal tech does not always require a law degree. After starting with a consultancy job that involved managing large-scale e-discovery and document review projects, she moved to Google, where she helped launch the search giant's e-discovery operations and program management groups.
During her time with Google, Zmrhal earned an MBA from Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, which furthered her interest in legal tech and how these advances are changing the business of law.
In her view, Zmrhal sees technology-driven improvements helping to modernize and improve the business of law. For example, onboarding programs and playbooks on how to run e-discovery, to name just two, are now much shorter and more intuitive than before, which help workflows for attorneys and improve outcomes for their clients.
After moving to DISCO from Google several years ago, Zmrhal's fascination with figuring out how to change the way legal professionals work and how to have an impact on the broader organization has continued. The goal, she says, is "after the application of technology, your people are more efficient. They are using the right processes."
While at DISCO, Zmrhal met others who shared her enthusiasm for legal technology and the ability of new platforms to transform the industry to serve clients better. Before becoming the company's Chief Revenue Office, Andrew Shimek worked as a litigator and in legal publishing and sales before diving deep into the world of e-discovery. This eventually led him to DISCO where he continues to work on many of the same legal tech issues that Zmrhal and DeBord as involved in.
"I just have this unbridled commitment to help improve our clients' legal outcomes by provisioning great technology," says Shimek.
Pamela Brownstein is a freelance writer covering legal issues and technology
Want to learn more about how technology is changing the legal profession and what that means for your career? Check out DISCO's Just Hearsay podcast where industry veterans Kristin Zmrhal and Andrew Shimek discuss what's new, what's exciting, and what's possible with the right legal technology.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250