Summer Associates Rate Their Experience: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 28, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ISSUE OF FIRST IMPRESSION - Big Law apparently put its best white shoe forward this past summer. According to The American Lawyer's 2022 Summer Associates Satisfaction Survey, most summer associates had overwhelmingly positive experiences at their firms. As Law.com's Dan Roe reports, the majority of law firms in our survey of 5,485 summer associates scored above 4.5 out of 5 after we asked summers to give firms marks on partner access and mentorship, interactions with other associates, interesting legal work, and firms' alignment with their own stated goals and self-image. Despite firms' extravagant summer associate retreats and events, which we'll get to shortly, associates valued their experiences in the office. Two-thirds of firms held mostly in-person programs, while one-third welcomed associates to the office five days a week. Hybrid work continues to be the most popular policy, with 84% of associates calling it their ideal working environment.
WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? - Law firms roll out the red carpet for their summer associates. But for their actual associates? They pretty much roll it right back up again. As Law.com International's Hannah Walker reports, partners are growing increasingly frustrated with what they believe is a growing list of unreasonable demands from young lawyers. Perhaps even more irritated are recruiters, who have begun to realize that "You'll get nothing and like it" no longer plays as well these days. One London recruiter with a focus on the associate market said: "Associates in small national firms in the regions are saying they'll only move to London for £100,000, a sign-on bonus, and they want to work from home. It's not feasible. He added: "If you're 25 and thinking you can ask this and more from firms now, get stuffed. It's poor form." Associates, meanwhile, argue that they are simply drawing much-needed lines on areas such as work-life balance. "We don't see our futures as our careers, we see our futures as human beings—life is too short after being stuck indoors for two years," explained one junior associate based in London. "Partners might not understand because they're used to the linear trap of lawyering—associates aren't wedded to it."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Blake J. Burgan and Kristine A. Gordon of Taft Stettinius & Hollister have stepped in as defense counsel to Jerry Asher, in his official capacity as Howard County Sheriff, in a pending wage-and-hour class action. The suit was filed July 22 in Indiana Southern District Court by Hassler Kondras Miller LLP and The Law Office of Robert J. Hunt on behalf of individuals employed by defendant as hourly-paid Howard County jail employees who contend that they were not paid for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, is 1:22-cv-01467, Partlow v. Asher. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - ProPublica, an organization of investigative journalists, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Navy and Department of Defense on Tuesday in California Southern District Court in connection with the prosecution of Ryan Mays, who is currently on trial for allegedly setting the USS Bonhomme Richard on fire in San Diego. The suit accuses the defendants of concealing court records and documents relating to the fire and to the investigation of Mays, including an alleged internal report recommending that the case not proceed to trial. The suit was brought by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher. The case is 3:22-cv-01455, ProPublica Inc. v. Butler et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Early Decision Programs Pose Risks to Applicants and Law Schools Alike By Christine Charnosky |
'Suckers' and Showstoppers: Everyone's Watching the Supreme Court's 2022 IP Docket By Scott Graham |
3rd Circ. Sides With American Airlines Over Firing of Employee for Racially Insensitive Facebook Posts By Colleen Murphy |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250