Rising Client Expectations Ratchet Up Pressure on Law Firms: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 04, 2022 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Law Firm Client Relationships
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
UNDER PRESSURE - Client demand = good. Client demands = maybe not so much. As Law.com's Jessie Yount and Hugo Guzman report, corporate legal departments and other law firm clients are becoming increasingly assertive about the need to boost efficiency and control costs—adding another layer of challenges for law firms already wrestling with a sharp drop in deal work and other economic pressures. In-house departments are demanding more for less from outside counsel. From fixed-fee arrangements to more efficient staffing, general counsel want law firms to offer more choice and flexibility and potentially share in more of the risk. With economic and client pressures escalating, some law firms in recent weeks have unleashed a range of austerity measures, from pausing hiring and deferring associate classes to relying on performance reviews to thin attorney ranks.
IT'S ALL GONNA COME TOGETHER - Small and boutique law firms have helped drive an increase in legal industry combinations this year. Going forward, Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, merger activity is expected to be robust heading into 2023 amid rising fears of a recession as well as some law firms reigniting talks that were paused during the pandemic. Overall, law firm mergers still remain below average, analysts at Washington, D.C.-based Fairfax Associates wrote this week. The group tallied 12 completed law firm mergers in the third quarter, with 37 total mergers through 2022. That's more than last year's count of 33 at this same point in time, but below the 10-year average of about 44 through the first three quarters of the year. But after a "surprisingly quiet" start to the year and plenty of economic and geopolitical uncertainty through most of 2022, the analysts were optimistic that combinations would rise, saying interest in mergers remains high across the industry. "We expect to see additional mergers announced in Q4 (although some may not be effective until 2023), and robust activity into next year," the report stated.
ON THE RADAR - Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors were slapped with a consumer class action Monday in Minnesota District Court over the ignition systems of certain vehicles. The case, brought by Hellmuth & Johnson, asserts that the systems are 'hackable' by malicious third parties, leading to a 'nationwide rash' of auto thefts. The suit further claims that there are tutorial videos posted on social media which demonstrate how to bypass the vehicles' ignition systems. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 0:22-cv-02431, Hilliard et al v. Kia America, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Divergent Strategies: Thousands of Zantac Lawsuits Scatter Nationwide as Lawyers Clash By Amanda Bronstad |
Firms Expect Breaches. So Why Aren't They Better Prepared? By Rhys Dipshan |
Trump Sues CNN, Alleging It Has Used a Series of Defamatory Labels to Describe Him By Brad Kutner |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readTrump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Hurricane Relief—IRS Offers Extended Deadlines and Tax Benefits
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'When the Firm Needs Something Done, Raise Your Hand,' Says Eric Kennedy of Buchalter
- 3People in the News—Nov. 15, 2024—Lamb McErlane, Faye Riva, Stradley Ronon
- 4'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
- 5Federal Judge Finds Neiman Marcus Liable in Personal Injury Suit for Unsecured 13-Pound Painting
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250