23. Post Pandemic Leadership Challenges — WFH
The work-from-home topic literally didn't exist before the pandemic, now it's front and center. The worst of the pandemic seems to have receded, but this issue remains. The WFH toothpaste is out of the tube, and it won't go back in.
October 07, 2022 at 08:17 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
The COVID-19 pandemic might be officially "over," but many of the practices that arose from the pandemic will be here to stay. That leads to an issue that law firms will struggle with —leadership in the post pandemic era. This lesson begins a series addressing that issue and how lean law principles can help. We start with the most pressing of those issues — working from home (WFH).
This WFH topic literally didn't exist before the pandemic, now it's front and center. Sure, there were attorneys who worked from the road and off-hours but that's not the same as the complex and integrated systems and procedures that had to be set up for full-time remote working by the entire firm (including paralegals, assistants and other support staff such as IT). The worst of the pandemic seems to have receded, but this issue remains. The WFH toothpaste is out of the tube, and it won't go back in.
Many law firms are still so challenged by WFH, that their policy is not to have a policy. Instead, they have guidelines. These tend to be a version of: "we'd like you to come into the office, we're not saying you'd have to, but it'd be great if you did, at least a few days a week."
So much for the law firm standpoint. As we often discuss in Lean Adviser, the attorney-client experience is key. So let's look at WFH from the standpoints of attorneys and clients. This week our focus is attorneys.
An attorney in New York might take the subway and then walk a few blocks, while another in Austin might drive to the office and park outside. In the pandemic, one experience was a greater health risk than the other.
That health card may now be less valid, but a bigger issue remains: For many attorneys, working from home works. A WFH attorney can get up at 7 am, grab a coffee and a banana and do 3 hours of uninterrupted work before 10:30. A commuting attorney will often achieve very little by 10:30 (and that is assuming there are no unexpected obstacles in the attorney getting to the office, such as cancelled or delayed trains, traffic jams, long lines at Starbucks for that morning coffee, car trouble, etc.). (Certainly there could be a cost analysis done of the wear and tear on cars for those driving to work vs. working from home and not using the car.) As we've all learned, this disparity continues all day, and into the evening.
Where this is headed and where it will stay is hybrid working. As we've discussed, the current generation sees things differently and have different values and priorities than previous generations. For them in particular, this is irreversible. Many law firm leaders are coming to terms with this as a durable reality, which is absolutely the right reaction.
As ever, Lean Adviser has some insights on this issue. Remember, one of our fundamentals is just not the work you do, it's how you do the work. Is it planned, structured, organized, goal-oriented and efficient? If applied thoughtfully, hybrid WFH aligns neatly with those attributes. Done right, hybrid WFH can benefit attorneys, firms and clients, the last of which is the topic of the next lesson.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250