Cloud Integration Causing Headaches for Law Firms: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 07, 2022 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
PERFORMANCE ANXIETY - Just a few months ago, despite plenty of global tumult, law firms were desperate to hire as many lawyers as they could. Firms were having trouble meeting client demand, particularly on the corporate side. Alas, nothing gold can stay. As inflation fears persist and deal work slows, the chatter and some early movement all point to a trimming of the collective ranks on the way. But this "rightsizing" is not likely to take the form of mass layoffs, Rather, much to the chagrin of some handsomely compensated attorneys, many firms plan to reduce head count through aggressive performance reviews. But, as Law.com's Gina Passarella writes in this week's Barometer newsletter, the move to counsel out attorneys through performance reviews could be tempered by a move to transition lawyers to busier practice areas. Meanwhile, as is the case during any down market, there will also be those firms that look to capitalize on the opportunities presented, investing in talent and practice acquisition, taking advantage of other firms' head count management. To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
CLOUD OF CONFUSION - Law firm partners aren't just yelling at clouds in a figurative sense. Many are also growing increasingly frustrated with their firms' efforts to adopt cloud-based tools, Law.com's Isha Marathe reports. Industry observers expect law firm cloud transitions to continue to steadily ramp up, albeit in various strategic phases. Still, experts noted that the path toward cloud migration comes with significant snags that legal will have to overcome in the coming years. While some concerns are dependent on firm size and resource availability, others are based on the growing cybersecurity issues and tricky integration issues. Todd Corham, the chief information officer at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, said the primary problems holding firms back are security and a lack of integration between cloud applications because the connectors are still immature. "A lot of your traditional security people aren't necessarily your cloud people. They're on-prem people. So that can bring up security issues," Corham said. "Then the places where all these different cloud applications talk to each other [APIs] … can be slow, cumbersome, and quirky, and not every mix of tools is going to work as seamlessly as designed. We have some bugs to get out of those systems."
ON THE RADAR - Bethenny Frankel, entrepreneur and alum of the reality series "The Real Housewives of New York City," filed a publicity rights class action against TikTok on Thursday in New York Southern District Court. The suit, brought by Morgan & Morgan, accuses the popular video app of allowing 'unscrupulous' parties to misappropriate the content, likenesses and voices of social media influencers for the purpose of creating a false association with certain brands in order to sell counterfeit items. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:22-cv-08503, Frankel v. TikTok, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
State Admissions Board Investigating Reddit Post 'Confessing' to Cheating on Bar Exam By Christine Charnosky |
Are We Overthinking Office Return Strategies? By Anthony Davies |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
What About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Avantia CEO Discusses Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250