Post-Pandemic, Law Firms Emphasize Cross-Office Collaboration: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 11, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
REACH OUT AND TOUCH SOMEONE - Most of us have spent our whole lives believing the only way to collaborate with someone in real time was to travel by land, air or sea to meet with them in person. But recently, some corners of the legal industry have begun experimenting with devices that allow for communication to be accomplished across great physical distances, without any need for relocation or even postage costs. As Law.com's Jacob Polacheck reports, while in-person meetings among lawyers in the same law firm office may have plummeted during the pandemic, some firm leaders say one perk from the time period was increased communication between lawyers in different offices. And now there's an effort among some firms to keep up that inter-office collaboration, using instruments such as telephones and personal computers equipped with "Internet." This may all sound like some kind of science fiction novel, but those who have participated in these strange long-distance experiments say the results are very real. And curiosity is growing. In fact, Carlos Pauling, the executive director for Major, Lindsey & Africa's partner practice group, told Polacheck that he's having one to three conversations weekly with managing partners at large law firms who are interested in learning more about how technology can aid in cross-office collaboration.
PLAYING SOFTBALL? - As Law.com's Hugo Guzman reports, a new study from Wolters Kluwer found that many legal departments do a pitiful job negotiating outside counsel rates—with companies in the financial and banking industries being the big exception. In fact, report author Nathan Cemenska said many legal departments "do not even attempt to exercise any central control, but decentralize rate negotiations out to in-house counsel, many of whom lack the skills, gumption, desire and/or temperament to take an arm's-length tone in rate negotiations—with results that are all too predictable." But wait—aren't a lot of in-house lawyers specifically trained in the art of negotiation? Yes, but as Jason Winmill, managing partner of the legal department consulting firm Argopoint, pointed out: "[N]egotiation takes on a different tenor when you're sitting across from an external partner whose collaboration you rely on for critical support."
ON THE RADAR - Simpson Thacher & Bartlett counseled the Royal Bank of Canada, Mizuho Bank Ltd. and PNC Bank NA, acting as joint lead arrangers and underwriters, in connection with EQT Corp.'s $2.5 billion unsecured bridge and term loan facility. Concurrently, Simpson Thacher also represented, RBC Capital Markets, Mizuho Securities USA and PNC Capital Markets, acting as underwriters, in connection with EQT's $500 million in aggregate note offering. The Simpson Thacher team included partners Jonathan Ozner and Brandan Still. Counsel information for EQT Corp., which is based Pittsburg, was not immediately available. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
$35M SEC Fine Underscores Growing Data Retention Focus—and Shortcomings By Isha Marathe |
How I Made Partner: 'Communication and Collaboration Are Keys to Success,' Says Andrew Hazen of Hall Booth Smith By Tasha Norman |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
What Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250