Many Clients Want Virtual Meetings With Their Lawyers: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING DON'T COME AROUND HERE NO MORE - Law firm partners…
October 13, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
DON'T COME AROUND HERE NO MORE - Law firm partners can't wait to see their clients in person again. But according to a new study, the feeling is not necessarily mutual. Awkward! As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, the survey, from legal technology company Clio, found clients are 25% more likely (35% compared to 28%) to prefer virtual meetings over in-person meetings. Clio's report is partly based on a survey of more than 1,100 legal professionals, almost 500 professionals from other industries and more 1,150 consumers of its cloud-based legal products who were surveyed this April and May. The report did find, however, that even though clients may not want to meet in person with their attorneys, they still want them to be local. The report suggests this is because clients want their outside counsel to know local laws and regulations but also allows for the fact that clients simply want the option of an in-person meeting available to them.
KILLING TIME - U.S. lawyers have been spending a little more of their workday on billable hours this year, compared with the last three years, but continue to devote two-thirds of their time to non-billable matters, Law.com's Brenda Sapino Jeffreys reports. According to a 2022 Legal Trends Report made public this week by Clio, a Canadian company that provides cloud-based practice management for firms, U.S. lawyers are putting 33% of an eight-hour day, or 2.6 hours, on billable hours—a statistic known as the utilization rate. The rate was 31% for the last three years. They are also billing more hours on average for every matter they take, according to the report. With demand up, lawyers are opening new cases at a rate averaging 10% higher when compared with a baseline of 2019, and are converting that increase in new matters to more billable hours, according to the report. "The increase in billable hours indicated lawyers are capturing more billable time, taking on larger cases that require more work, or that the average case requires more time to complete," Clio wrote in the report. Compared with a baseline of 2019, which was before the pandemic, the average lawyer caseload was 10% higher from March 2021 to August 2022, and average billable hours were up 22%. During that same time, the number of hours billed to clients—the realization rate—was up by an average of 28%, and revenue was up by 31%. That means, according to the report, that every hour of legal work has become more valuable to firms.
ON THE RADAR - Vista Equity Partners has agreed to acquire KnowBe4, a security awareness training platform, for an equity value of approximately $4.6 billion in cash. The transaction, announced Oct. 12, is expected to close in the first half of 2023. Austin, Texas-based Vista Equity is advised by Kirkland & Ellis. KnowBe4, which is based in Clearwater, Florida, is represented by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati and Potter Anderson & Corroon. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is counseling KKR & Co. The Gibson Dunn team includes partners Saee Muzumdar and Wim De Vlieger. A Latham & Watkins team led by partners Hans Brigham and Bradley Faris represent Elephant Partners. Moulton Moore Stella is serving as legal counsel to KnowBe4 founder, Stu Sjouwerman. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
AccessLex Provides Grant for HBCU Law Schools, Others to Participate in NALP Study By Christine Charnosky |
Morrison & Foerster to Merge With Durie Tangri By Jessie Yount |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250