25. Post Pandemic Leadership Challenges: What Should Law Firms Be Asking Their Clients?
Why are malpractice claims increasing in frequency and severity, why are clients unhappy and why are lawyers leaving the profession in droves? To understand this, we need to consider what law firms are not asking of their attorneys.
October 21, 2022 at 11:33 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
In the previous lesson on post-pandemic leadership challenges, we applied the lean principles to "Work From Home." We noted that all legal work should be in service of the assignment, and so the task at hand should decide where to do the work. We called this "Project-led WFH."
At a time when law firms are uncertain about WFH and other policies, and how to handle their messaging, this is a good time to examine what law firms ask their attorneys to do:
|- Make Money: Record your hours, get your bills out and get them paid. When demand goes up and talent wars break out, firms ask their attorneys to make hay. Come the downturn and the fear of recession, firms lay off the lawyers. What's the constant? Demand is variable, attorneys are expendable, but billing pressure is relentless.
- Don't leave: If we have work, and you're making money for us, don't leave. That is, until things change and we ask you to go, in which case so long and be gone.
- Follow the rules: Yes, we want you to get onto execution and start billing, but just remember there are procedures and protocols around client intake and conflicts. Jump through those hoops, and then have at it. Which leads to …
- Don't screw up: Don't blow deadlines or make dumb mistakes, because that stuff makes the bill uncollectable, and leads to expensive lawsuits and even bigger insurance premiums. Lastly, a new post-pandemic request:
- Come to the office: We need you to come back, for culture building, collaboration and mentoring. We also want to create a sense of belonging, so folks stop leaving. Even if it's a hybrid schedule, unrelated to the task of the day, come in anyway.
There is nothing intrinsically wrong in any of these requests. Framed correctly, they are all legitimate. So why are malpractice claims increasing in frequency and severity, why are clients unhappy and why are lawyers leaving the profession in droves? To understand this, we need to consider what law firms are not asking of their attorneys.
Once again, it's helpful to look at the challenges of law firm leadership through the prism of Lean Adviser. Here is our list of what law firms commonly fail to ask of their attorneys:
|- Specialize in your clients, not just their sector.
- Before you take on a new assignment, make sure you understand and record the full context and the agreed scope.
- Let the task at hand decide where you work — be it from home, the office or offsite.
- Make loss prevention part of the daily execution of tasks.
- Make realistic promises and reasonable demands.
- Be reliable; just do what you say you're going to do. Remember reliability is a safety superpower.
And lastly, don't forget to ask:
|- How can we help you, or equip you to do the job better?
- How are you coping, are you feeling burnt out?
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250