Legal Chiefs Say Keeping a Level Head Can Avert Crises: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 24, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Law Department Management
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CRISIS MISMANAGEMENT - For in-house counsel, one of the hardest things about managing a crisis is being able to distinguish a true emergency from a run-of-the-mill problem. But, as panelists noted during ALM's Women Influence and Power in Law Conference in Washington, D.C., last week, a miscalculation in that regard can easily turn a minor issue into a full-blown crisis. "If it can be controlled, it's not a crisis," said Gina Rubel, CEO of Furia Rubel Communications, a marketing and PR firm in Doylestown, Pennsylvania. "Sometimes as attorneys we may view something as a crisis and it may not necessarily be. Most incidents can be controlled and may not have to become a crisis. Oftentimes, we create the crisis ourselves," she added. As Law.com's Trudy Knockless reports, Rubel was a panelist for a session titled "Legal's Active Role in Managing a PR Crisis." Rubel's fellow panelist, Stacia Cardille, strategy director for legislative oversight at Google, said that, when an organization is dealing with a crisis, one of the most important things legal can do is project calm and present a moderated approach. "The other thing that can be very helpful is creating a privileged and confidential single source of truth document. It would just be that one place where you're trying to gather as much information about the incident as possible," she said.
GETTING SCHOOLED - Higher education has long been a source of business for Big Law. But now, Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, law firms now are responding to a surge in business from colleges facing renewed questions on immigration and affirmative action, as well as new ones from COVID-19, sports betting and athlete compensation. Law firm leaders say they've seen an increase in need from universities, and several firms from the Am Law 100 on down have launched new groups over the last few years to handle it. "We've seen an enormous uptick in demand, really exceeding our expectations," said Ishan Bhabha, a partner at Jenner & Block and co-chair of the firm's education practice. "As someone who spends most of my time working for institutions of higher education, that is absolutely correct." He said it's difficult to pinpoint a single cause, especially since colleges have been a locus of controversy for decades. But he said universities were "certainly in the crosshairs" during the Trump administration with conservative free-speech challenges and policies related to immigration, for example.
ON THE RADAR - Revlon, L'Oreal and other defendants were hit with a product liability lawsuit Friday in New York Southern District Court over hair straightening products marketed to African American customers. The court case was filed on behalf of an individual plaintiff who alleges that she developed uterine cancer as a result of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in the defendants' products. The suit is backed by DiCello Levitt and Bullock Ward Mason LLC. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-09008, Terrell v. Revlon Consumer Products Corp. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Sen. Lindsey Graham Hires Jones Day's Don McGahn In Bid to Halt His Grand Jury Testimony By Marcia Coyle |
Legal Speak at WIPL 2022: How Legal Departments Can Support Women Attorneys By Alaina Lancaster and Zack Needles |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
GCs Increasingly Take Lead When Crises Hit, With Companies' Lack of Preparedness Escalating Challenge
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250