Big Law's High-Yield Bond, Leveraged Finance Practices Take Hit: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 25, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BOND ISSUES - Across corporate departments in Big Law, capital markets lawyers are seeing market conditions that appear similar to the lead-up to other recessions, while lawyers who handle high-yield bonds are seeing a large drop in business year-over-year. Still, corporate lawyers told Law.com's Patrick Smith they still have some pockets of sustained business, and some say they are not trimming their attorney ranks. A slow deal period and market instability have seen banks write down over $1 billion in loans through the second fiscal quarter of 2022. Meanwhile, interest rates on high-yield bonds have shot up over 9% as investors seem less likely to take chances on debt financing and risky loans. "From a practice standpoint, it is a painful period, but it is temporary," said Jonathan Schaffzin, corporate partner and executive committee member of Cahill Gordon & Reindel, whose firm specialty is high-yield bond work. Schaffzin said the lack of M&A activity now as well as companies moving up their refinancings during the low-interest rate period of the previous two years will make for a weak deal pipeline moving into 2023. But for a firm like Cahill, which according to Schaffzin holds over 30% of the market, that slowdown hasn't translated into layoffs or other more drastic measures. "The majority of our lawyers are capable of working on both bank and bond deals," he said. "We have always been relatively leanly staffed because our lawyers can be flexible on what they work on."
EASING UP ON ESG - CEOs say they still believe in the importance of ESG, but they're willing to put it on the back burner for a while because of economic pressures, according to a new survey from KPMG. As Law.com's Greg Andrews reports, the survey found that, as economic uncertainty continues, 50% are pausing or reconsidering their existing or planned ESG efforts over the next six months, and 34% already have done so. The findings in the KPMG CEO Outlook, which came out this month and is based on interviews with 1,325 global CEOs, are sure to have a big impact on legal departments, which play a key role in devising and implementing ESG program at many companies. The pause represents the first major loss of momentum for environmental, social and governance programs, since they began sweeping through legal departments like a tornado in recent years, vastly altering job responsibilities for in-house counsel and increasing legal and regulatory risks. But KMPG cautioned that any pullback would be occurring at a time when stakeholders continue to ratchet up their ESG expectations. "ESG has become an intrinsic business imperative," the study's authors note. "Delaying key ESG efforts could make businesses more reactive in the future rather than help them lead the way with greater transparency, resilience and sustainability."
ON THE RADAR - American Airlines Group and Envoy Air Inc. were sued Monday in Texas Southern District Court over alleged injuries related to a 2020 Bahamas bound flight. The lawsuit was brought by Husain Law + Associates on behalf of two passengers who allege that they suffered physical and psychological harm when their plane skidded off the runway upon landing. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 4:22-cv-03670, Williams et al v. American Airlines, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Will Clarence Thomas Stay Involved in Lindsey Graham's Jan. 6 Testimony Challenge? By Marcia Coyle |
2000 Grad Gifts $17.5M to Columbia Law, the Largest Single Commitment in the Law School's History By Christine Charnosky |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMany Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readLife Sciences M&A Set to Boom, Litigation to Remain Steady Under New Trump Admin
5 minute read'Innovation Over Regulation': Tech Litigators and Experts Share Insights on the Future of AI, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Under Trump
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Brown Rudnick Picks Up Bochner Patent Trial Team in Houston
- 2HSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
- 3Kirkland Tech Transactions Partner Heads to Polsinelli
- 4A Government Lawyer's Tough Day at the Supreme Court
- 5Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250