6th Circuit Denies $1 Million 'Loss of Referrals' Insurance Coverage Finding Temporary Closure Is Not Termination of Business
"Neither the complaint nor its exhibits explain which, if any, of the Key Referral Sources are permanently closed, how the relationship with any Key Referral Source has been permanently impacted by the suspended business, or how Retina Center determined it suffered a loss in excess of $1,000,000," Judge John K. Bush wrote in the opinion. "Without that necessary information, the pleadings do not rise above speculation."
October 27, 2022 at 10:27 AM
5 minute read
![The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse, 100 East Fifth St., Cincinnati, Ohio. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2021/12/Sixth-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-767x633.jpg)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a Tennessee district court ruling denying insurance coverage to Retina Center of New Jersey over $1 million in income lost by the temporary closure of referral sources during the COVID-19 pandemic and, instead, found that the policy covered only termination or cancellation of that business for at least 60 days.
According to the opinion, Eye Centers of America, doing business as Retina Center of New Jersey, sued its insurer, Series Protected Cell 1, a Series of Oxford Insurance, over coverage for income lost during the temporary closure of referral resources during the coronavirus pandemic under its "Actual Net Loss Insurance Policy."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2023/05/United-Airlines-767x633.jpg)
COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
3 minute read![State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/423/2021/11/Closed-due-to-Covid-19-767x633.jpg)
State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
![Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2022/01/Peloton-Store-2-767x633.jpg)
Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike
2 minute read![Federal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over Federal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/09/COVID-19-PPE-kit-767x633.jpg)
Federal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250