How Lawyers Can Harness Data to Improve Operations and Better Serve Clients
With half mid- and large-size law firms lacking data visibility, workflow-management technology improves efficiency, secures the bottom line and can help avoid a back-office crisis.
October 31, 2022 at 09:19 AM
5 minute read
According to a recent survey, implementing technology to manage legal support tasks is the priority of most firms wanting to improve workflow visibility.
Law firms continue to face pressure to provide clients with the best services at the lowest costs, which means clients are now asking attorneys for alternative billing methods, reduced fees, and additional transparency into how matters are managed – and by whom.
To compensate, the legal industry is embracing tech tools to improve efficiency and gain actionable insights through matter-related data analysis. But what happens on the support side is still a bit fuzzy. A recent survey by BigHand of 836 legal professionals at mid- and large-size firms throughout North America and the United Kingdom finds that more than half of respondents report that they lack complete data or visibility around:
- How many tasks lawyers send to support staff
- The capacity or use of support staff
- Task turnaround times
Law firms understand that this is a problem that needs solving. Improving workflow visibility, especially in the hybrid work environment, is a priority for 55% of the BigHand North American survey's respondents, who plan to implement technology to manage legal support tasks in the next two years. Doing so should help the 81% of responding firms that report they still manually delegate tasks to support staff, regardless of their physical location.
Lack of data affects the bottom line
Poor visibility into support-side workflows is hurting law firms' client service and can negatively impact the fee-earning side of the business, says Eric Wangler, BigHand's North American President and Global Managing Director of People Productivity.
That's because inefficiencies around task delegation and completion put pressure on billable time and can ultimately hurt profitability. Yet internal bottlenecks and lack of access to information about staff capacity means lawyers often take care of administrative tasks themselves instead of delegating them.
"The client wants the work done by the most competent person at the lowest cost," says Wangler. "They don't want lawyers who are typically billing out very high fees to be completing work that somebody on the admin side could do much cheaper and much more efficiently."
Clients especially don't want lawyers who are not skilled in administrative work spending their time on such tasks. Not only is it inefficient, but work-product quality could suffer, causing damage to client relationships.
Working smarter by using data
Attrition and issues around support-staff job satisfaction and retention in the business climate are compounding the task workflow issue. Nearly two-thirds of BigHand survey respondents expect to lose more than 60 percent of their support staff within the next five years. More than half of those expect to lose more than 80 percent of support staff in that timeframe. And 55% of North American respondents who work in support services say they'd look for a new job if they were required to work more than three days a week in the office.
For those reasons and more, efficiency around how administrative tasks are completed will become more critical than ever – while law firms must think hard about how their support teams are structured, how work is delegated, and how much those teams cost.
"One of the biggest challenges firms have is that they just do not have data," says Wangler. "They don't understand what their back office is doing or what those folks are busy with all day."
Firms can overcome these efficiency hurdles and enable data-based decision-making with workflow-management software, says Wangler. And that software should be put into place now – before support staff exit, taking their institutional knowledge with them.
The benefits of such tools are many, but most importantly, the software allows lawyers and support staff to focus on the work they're best at. For lawyers, that is providing counsel and client service. For support staff, that is working effectively on impactful tasks that contribute to the firm's bottom line.
"Workflow technology enables the ability to work effectively, whether you're in the office or at home," says Wangler. "If you're up against a deadline, you've got a resource challenge, or one of your support teams is overwhelmed because they're too busy, you can very easily see that issue develop – and you can take actions to change that."
Workflow-management tools can bring about a data-based culture – giving law firms the futureproofing they need against a business climate that is always changing. The visibility that workflow management software provides can help firms identify skill gaps, understand productivity, and even help retain their best talent.
"Firms are going to have to change the way they're delivering support if they're going to make sure that they're keeping clients satisfied and lawyers focused," says Wangler. "An operational model that capitalizes on skill, creates efficiencies and recognizes that hybrid work is here to stay is mission-critical for law firms."
Joe Stanganelli is a writer and recovering attorney. He is managing director of content advisory Blackwood King LC.
To find out more or access the full BigHand report, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorth Carolina Courts Switch to Digital, Face Extreme Weather in 2024
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250