ABA Warns Lawyers About CC'ing Clients on Emails: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
November 07, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
LEAVE THEM OUT OF IT - It's an indisputable fact that the world would be a better place if we all had to fill out an affidavit to show cause before copying someone on an email. For attorneys, in particular, "CC" should be regarded as a four-letter word. As Law.com's Charles Toutant reports, the ABA has warned lawyers to avoid copying their clients when sending an email to opposing counsel. Lawyers who copy their clients in an electronic communication give implied consent to receiving a "reply all" response that includes the lawyer's client, the ABA said in its latest ethics opinion. And where the sending lawyer consents to such communications, the receiving lawyer who responds with a "reply all" message is not overreaching or attempting to pry into confidential lawyer-client communications, the ABA said. But lawyers who include a client in such a communication chain could regret their action later, according to the opinion. "By copying their clients on emails and texts to receiving counsel, sending lawyers risk an imprudent 'reply all' from their clients. Email and text messaging replies are often generated quickly, and the client may reply hastily with sensitive or compromising information. Thus, the better practice is not to copy the client on an email or text to receiving counsel; instead, the lawyer generally should separately forward any pertinent emails or texts to the client," the ABA said in Formal Opinion 503 of its Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility.
GROWTH AREAS - Lateral partner moves have increased across the U.S. this year—especially in smaller markets where Big Law is showing growing interest. Markets such as Salt Lake City, Seattle and Charlotte, North Carolina, have seen "massive" growth in partner moves in 2022, but it's begun to tail off in places such as Nashville, Tennessee, and Denver, which may be losing steam after being driven by comparably smaller practice areas, according to some analysts. Those markets are still above the five-year averages, but the declines this year are notable, Gregory Hamman, chief data officer at Decipher, told Law.com's Andrew Maloney. "Real estate and health care have really driven Nashville's laterals over the last few years," Hamman said. "It's not an overly huge market, and when you're talking about smaller practice areas like real estate and health care, it just exhausts itself. I think that explains why Nashville ran out of steam in 2022."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Madeline D. Hepler and Erin C. Kolter of Dorsey & Whitney have stepped in as defense counsel to The Search People Enterprises in a pending copyright and trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 9 in Washington Western District Court by Davis Wright Tremaine on behalf of Microsoft, accuses the defendants of selling black market access to Microsoft software and falsely advertising the illicit product as authentic. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Tana Lin, is 2:22-cv-01113, Microsoft Corp. v. The Search People Enterprises Ltd. et al. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Software company Palantir Technologies, co-founder Peter Thiel and other company insiders were hit with a securities class action Friday in Colorado District Court. The lawsuit, filed by Johnson Fistel LLP and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, claims that the defendants misled investors regarding the sustainability of revenue growth driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the complaint, Palantir disguised the slowdown by embarking on a 'highly unorthodox' investment strategy involving SPACs to create the appearance of robust growth. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-02893, Liu v. Palantir Technologies Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Why It's Time for Lawyers to Get Curious About Blockchain By Zack Needles and Alaina Lancaster |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Legaltech Rundown: LexisNexis Releases Lexis+ AI Mobile App, Hotshot Launches New M&A Training Simulation, and More
- 3Perkins Coie Boasts Diverse Partner Class
- 4READ THE DOC: NY Judge Indefinitely Delays Sentencing in Trump Hush Money Case
- 5US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250