DOJ Sees Mixed Results in Litigation-Focused Antitrust Strategy: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
November 08, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ANTITRUST ISSUES - The U.S. Justice Department's successful challenge to the merger of two major book publishers—Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster—provided a burst of momentum for the Biden administration's progressive antitrust approach. But, as Law.com's Andrew Goudsward reports, the ruling came after three successive judicial rebukes to the Justice Department in other cases, which dealt an early blow to a department that has vowed to go to court to press its more expansive view of antitrust enforcement. Antitrust lawyers cautioned against drawing overly broad conclusions from a set of cases that are highly fact-specific and involve industries as varying as book publishing, health care and agriculture. But the record so far has left some in the defense bar questioning the DOJ's litigation strategy. "Winning the [Penguin Random House] case was critical," said Steven Sunshine, the head of the global antitrust group at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. "You have to judge how successful Kanter is in moving his agenda by what changes to the law and what changes to enforcement policy he is able to make. That's a body of work. If you were to lose all the cases you're bringing, one could argue not only are you not moving the enforcement agenda, but you may be entrenching the old one."
TUMULTUOUS TIMES - Law firm leaders are likely to face mounting pressure to make cuts wherever they can find them as the end of the year approaches, with demand falling 0.7% relative to the same period last year and productivity falling 3.8%, according to a report published Monday. Every practice area sans labor and employment, which saw a modest 0.4% gain, saw declining demand, according to the latest Law Firm Financial Index report from Thomson Reuters. And even "historically high" billing rate growth, pegged at 4.8% relative to the third quarter of 2021 across law firm segments, is being eclipsed by inflation. All of that means Big Law is at an "inflection point," the report concluded, with equity partners quite possibly getting smaller payouts and firms potentially under pressure to cut into head count. Still, it's not all bleak. The report added that "most law firms continue to operate in a business-as-usual environment," and many of the declines are still based on incredibly high baselines from last year. "I think the takeaway is that the sky isn't falling," Bill Josten, strategic content manager for Thomson Reuters, told Law.com's Andrew Maloney. "But there are things we need to be very careful about."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Seth L. Hudson and Sarah Ashley Barnett of Nexsen Pruet have stepped in to represent Dumond Inc. in a pending trademark infringement and trade dress lawsuit. The action, over the sale of confusingly similar "Citristrip" paint remover products, was filed Aug. 26 in North Carolina Western District Court by Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick on behalf of W.M. Barr & Company Inc. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Frank D. Whitney, is 3:22-cv-00447, W.M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. Dumond, Inc. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Software company Palantir Technologies, co-founder Peter Thiel and other company insiders were hit with a securities class action Friday in Colorado District Court. The lawsuit, filed by Johnson Fistel LLP and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, claims that the defendants misled investors regarding the sustainability of revenue growth driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the complaint, Palantir disguised the slowdown by embarking on a 'highly unorthodox' investment strategy involving SPACs to create the appearance of robust growth. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-02893, Liu v. Palantir Technologies Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Ahead of Midterms, Big Law Attorneys Seek to Ensure Mail-In Ballots Are Tallied By Justin Henry |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250