For Crypto Attorneys, FTX Bankruptcy Is a 'Black Swan Event': The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
November 15, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BLACK SWAN - A tumultuous week for cryptocurrency trading giant FTX culminated in a bankruptcy filing Friday. But, as Law.com's Justin Henry and Alexander Lugo report, that may have been just the beginning. FTX has amassed a complex network of affiliated companies, including those who filed for bankruptcy Friday and have come under investigations by U.S. regulators. "FTX is so prominent in this industry as one of the top exchanges as well as its high-profile in its regulatory community as far as pushing regulatory laws…it's going to take a long time to work back and gain the trust of the investment community," said Jared Gianatasio, head of the cryptocurrency and digital assets practice at Kleinberg Kaplan, one of many firms gearing up to represent investors in the bankruptcies. "That's both retail and institutional by the way." The extent of the ripple effect this bankruptcy will have is not entirely known yet, because there can still be large entities with exposure to the exchange who have not made it public yet, Jeffrey Leavitt, an attorney involved with Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton's cryptocurrency practice, said. "It's going to bring a rush of demand for bankruptcy lawyers who have knowledge of the crypto space because this is a black swan event that doesn't really have a lot of precedents," said Leavitt. "There's probably going to be a lot of people and entities affected by this that will need that experience as this continues unfolding."
UNDER PRESSURE - The inadvertent disclosures in the Alex Jones trial and Jan. 6 investigation are likely to put more attention, and more pressure, on law firms' technology competence, Law.com's Cassandre Coyer reports. Mistakes from highly publicized cases could start catching insurers' attention, said Mary Mack, CEO and chief legal technologist for The Electronic Discovery Reference Model. "At a certain point, these kinds of fails will create some malpractice liability," Mack noted. "And then the insurance companies that underwrite attorneys will want to know if an individual attorney has processes that are up-to-date to safeguard their client communications." However, while many firms have legal malpractice insurance, Hinshaw & Culbertson partner Steve Puiszis, a member of the firm's professional liability practice, noted that inadvertent disclosures aren't always covered by these policies, which is another reason for lawyers to purchase cyber coverage. "That's another reason why lawyers need to also be considering cyber coverage, because if it doesn't fit within the professional liability policy, it would fit within and be covered under your cyber policy," he added.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Pan American Silver Corp. and and Agnico Eagle Ltd. have delivered a binding offer to acquire Yamana Gold Inc. for an aggregate consideration of approximately $4.8 billion. The transaction, announced Nov. 4, is expected to close late in the first quarter of 2023. Vancouver, Canada-based Pan American is advised by Borden Ladner Gervais and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. The Skadden Arps team includes partners June Dipchand, Ryan Dzierniejko and Eric Sensenbrenner. Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg is representing Agnico Eagle Ltd. Counsel information for Yamana Gold, which is based in Toronto, was not immediately available. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Core Scientific, a provider of infrastructure and software for blockchain networks and digital asset mining, and certain executives were slapped with a securities class action Monday in Texas Western District Court. The suit alleges that the defendants failed to disclose to investors that the company had taken on increasing energy costs, and its biggest client, Gryphon, lacked the financial backing to purchase data mining hardware. The suit also contends that Celsius Network LLC filed a motion for civil contempt in September alleging that Core Scientific has failed to meet its contractual obligations, further impacting profits adversely. The court action was brought by Glancy Prongay & Murray; Steckler Wayne Cherry & Love; and attorney Frank R. Cruz. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-01191, Pang v. Core Scientific Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Ethics Scholars Question Justice Thomas' Participation in Arizona Election Order By Marcia Coyle |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250