Time to Lay Off Lawyers or Scale Up? Big Law Faces Staffing Quandary
Could law firms have predicted this a year ago when they were slammed with billable hours and their associates were hitting all nighters to meet client deadlines?
December 01, 2022 at 02:32 PM
6 minute read
Each week, the Law.com Barometer newsletter, powered by the ALM Global Newsroom and Legalweek, brings you the trends, disruptions, and shifts our reporters and editors are tracking through coverage spanning every beat and region across the ALM Global Newsroom. The micro-topic coverage will not only help you navigate the changing legal landscape but also prepare you to discuss these shifts with thousands of legal leaders at Legalweek 2023, taking place March 20-23, 2023 in New York City. Registration is now open. Secure your ticket today.
|The Shift: Time to Lay Off Lawyers or Scale Up? Big Law Faces Quandary
What a difference just one year makes. At this point last year, law firms were in a hiring frenzy, gobbling up groups of associates because of a deluge of transactional work, including for SPACs, M&A matters, IPOs and real estate deals. Five or even six-figure bonuses were being offered to associates to get them to move—or stay in place without getting recruited.
With the slow down in most types of deals in 2022 however, law firms have less work on their hands. Associates at some firms—especially those with large corporate practices—are "underutilized," as some firm leaders say. Law.com has reported on associate cuts several firms, including at Kirkland & Ellis after performance reviews and at Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian. And just on Wednesday, Cooley announced it was laying off 150 lawyers and staff. Meanwhile, concerns are rising that more law firms, especially in New York, could also lay off lawyers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Chair of Montgomery McCracken Decamps for Morgan Lewis
New Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
7 minute read
A Crystal Ball You Can Bank On: Popular Social Media Attorney Makes Legal Predictions
Clifford Chance Hikes Partner Pay as UK Firms Fight to Stay Competitive on Compensation
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 2Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 3Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 4Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 5To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
