Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.


|

WHAT WE'RE WATCHING

ON THE BUBBLE - Many legal industry observers expect more Cooley-sized layoffs in 2023's first quarter in transactional-heavy firms, even beyond those reliant on the tech sector. For shops that already bulked up too much, too quickly during the recent boom, it's probably too late. But what about the rest of Big Law? Have law firms learned anything from yet another cycle of overhirings-turned-instant-firings or are they content to keep bringing aboard seasonal help like some kind of fancy Spirit Halloween? As Law.com's Justin Henry reports, it's a trickier problem than it might appear to be on the surface. "The way you solve it is to manage your time better or you turn down work," Mark Santiago, a New York-based law firm consultant and partner with SB2 Consultants, told Henry. "Both of these things are anathema to attorneys."

HOT PROPERTY - The tech sector has been hit hard by recent unstable economic conditions, but no matter how much upheaval ultimately occurs there is one reliable constant: fleece vests. OK, actually, there are two reliable constants: fleece vests and IP litigation. Big Law attorneys told Law.com's Jessie Yount that patent litigation continues to see steady demand and likely won't slow even as clients adopt other belt-tightening measures. "Those of us who went through 2008 know that patent litigation can be countercyclical," said Erin Gibson, the chair of the International Trade Commission practice at DLA Piper. "No one wants to be caught flat-footed. When bracing for a recession, companies are looking at alternative revenue streams and that can include the monetization of patents."

WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Jeffrey W. Brecher of Jackson Lewis has entered an appearance for McKesson, a Texas-based distributor of pharmaceutical and medical supplies, in a pending employment class action. The complaint was filed Oct. 10 in New York Southern District Court by Leeds Brown Law on behalf of manual laborers claiming delinquent wages. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Karas, is 7:22-cv-08601, Zachary et al v. McKesson Corporation. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.

ON THE RADAR - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a lawsuit Tuesday in New York Southern District Court targeting Samuel Bankman-Fried, founder and former CEO of Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange platform FTX, Alameda Research and other defendants. The lawsuit accuses Bankman-Fried and a 'small circle of insiders' of manipulating FTX digital asset code, and misappropriating FTX customer deposits to trade on outside digital asset exchanges as well as support various high-risk investments. The defendants are also accused of taking out hundreds of millions of dollars in so-called loans from Alameda to purchase luxury real estate and make political donations. A similar suit was filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission earlier today. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-10503, Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Bankman-Fried et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar


|

EDITOR'S PICKS

Court: Mintz Levin Attorney Had No Authority to Bind Client to Patent Infringement Settlement Agreement

By Allison Dunn