17. The Comp Sub Series: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
Like any presentation, the goal is to present real facts, in an interesting way, as a story. In this case the story is about you. The commonly used Q&A format may not lend itself to story-telling, but that's OK, we have a "lean hack" for that.
January 04, 2023 at 09:53 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
We're only days into January, and many attorneys are about to write their most important memo of the year. For many of us, it's self-evaluation time. We closed last year with two key takeaways from Lean Adviser: 1) plan before you execute; and 2) be user-friendly. Now we get to the substance — how to use those takeaways and the main concepts of lean law to crush your comp memo.
You may argue for a living and you may be good at it, but this isn't the time or place for that. Remember, those who will read your memo are also lawyers and they can argue back. Plus, there's a third voice in this conversation — your personal profitability stats. So don't argue for anything. Instead, create an impression that will lead to an outcome. Think of it as presenting a report and a plan, just as you would when preparing to represent a client using lean law methods.
Like any presentation, the goal is to present real facts, in an interesting way, as a story. In this case the story is about you. The commonly used Q&A format may not lend itself to story-telling, but that's OK, we have a "lean hack" for that. Instead of trying to work the questions, work the entire form. Unless it explicitly says no add-ins, you can create new sections to make it work for you.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It’s a Job About People, First and Foremost,' Says Alexander Lees of Milbank
Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readFormer Federal Judge Christopher Conner Joins Saxton & Stump as Attorney and Shareholder
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Buchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
- 2A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case
- 3Second DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
- 435 Years After CT's Affordable Housing Act, Progress Remains a Struggle
- 5Bankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250