For Max Profits in 2023, Data Visibility Beats Increased Billable Hours
With more than 50% of large law firms in North America and the U.K. reporting a heightened demand for financial transparency from clients, legal professionals need to take a data-driven approach to profit optimization, especially during uncertain economic times.
January 05, 2023 at 08:29 AM
3 minute read
In a recent survey, almost every law firm raised billable-hours targets in the preceding year; nearly half reported raising billable-hour targets by more than 10%.
Law firms' profitability may be reaching an inflection point, a new survey published by BigHand finds. The report, which includes responses from 800 legal professionals at large law firms (100+ attorneys) across the U.K. and North America, shows an increased awareness of what is impacting firms' bottom lines – with still some ways to go toward profit optimization.
More than half of all surveyed firms (53% in North America; 51% in the U.K.) reported facing heightened client demand for financial transparency. Accordingly, BigHand reports, law firms' biggest priority is improving client communication throughout each matter – lest they face a billing dispute in which they are forced to compromise.
"One of the major changes we've seen in the industry in the last five years is that, as clients get more sophisticated, they have legal-operations departments – and as firms get more sophisticated, they have their pricing people," said Rob Stote, Global Director of Financial Productivity Products at BigHand. "And having those two groups talk to each other . . . absolutely plays into write-offs reductions."
Time vs. Money
Almost every firm surveyed raised billable-hours targets in the preceding year; nearly half reported raising billable-hour targets by more than 10%.
But firms have also raised the number of billable hours for which they do not, in fact, actually bill.
Most law firms (75% in North America; 64% in the U.K.) reported an increase in write-offs in the past year. These increases are, as the report puts it, "spiraling." In fact, 55% of North American firms and 48% of U.K. firms reported that their write-offs increased by more than 10% during this time.
Write-offs represent the largest source of profit leakage for about 3 out of 10 firms, according to the survey.
The message is clear: Law firms need to work smarter, not harder, to increase profits.
"Yes, it's important to have your billable-hour targets," said Stote. "But at the end of the day, your collections are the most important piece. Are you getting paid for the piece of work you've done?"
Seeing and Understanding
Firms are increasingly working on improving internal data visibility.
About 20% of firms reported that they plan to review collections write-offs and write-downs; about the same number plan to review billing write-offs and write-downs. Many firms (44% in North America; 31% in the U.K.) plan to improve management and partners' visibility into lock-up data. And about 30% are implementing new approval processes for write-offs – in a bid to favor consistency over the discretion of individual managers who may not understand the implications downstream.
This latter development underscores the fact that visibility is nothing without understanding. As such, about 20% of law firms plan to provide pricing training to their fee-earning staff.
Stote emphasized that to be effective, this understanding of the relationship between profitability and matter-level data must extend beyond partnership and senior management.
"Firms have some work to do internally to make sure that they're raising the level of financial acumen [among] their lawyers," said Stote. "One of the biggest shifts we've seen over the last couple of years is that it's become more and more the responsibility of everybody at the firm to understand profitability."
Joe Stanganelli is a writer and recovering attorney. He is managing director of content advisory Blackwood King LC.
To find out more or access the full BigHand report, download the report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250