Financial Regulation Is Big Law's Newest Battleground: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 25, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
SUPREME DISAPPOINTMENT - On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court celebrated the start of the NFL playoffs by punting what could have been a decisive case regarding attorney-client privilege. In In re Grand Jury, No. 21-1397, the district court and the Ninth Circuit both said a law firm hired to prepare tax returns for a client could not shield its communications with that client from disclosure in a criminal investigation. As Law.com's Maria Dinzeo reports, the justices' decision (or lack thereof) was a blow to in-house counsel seeking clarity on how attorney-client privilege applies to their everyday dealings. Susanna McDonald, Association of Corporate Counsel vice president and chief legal officer, said the court missed an opportunity to weigh in on whether attorney-client privilege applies to "dual purpose" communications that contain advice on multiple legal and nonlegal issues. "In-house counsel need clarity on how all courts will view their client communications so that they can provide the best possible legal advice while also fulfilling their role as a strategic business partner," McDonald said.
RELENTLESS REGULATION - Big Law is making big investments in regulatory capabilities as tech and financial services become ever more intertwined. In recent months, Orrick, Davis Wright, Paul Hastings, Cooley, Wilmer, Polsinelli, Cravath and Fenwick have all welcomed regulatory partners. So what's behind this trend? "For a long time, industries stayed in their own lane," Kent Zimmermann, a law firm consultant at Zeughauser Group, told Law.com's Jessie Yount. "Financial services was in one lane, tech was in one lane, life sciences was in one lane. Today they're all converging, partly because of tech-driven innovation. That is partially why [those sectors] are increasingly regulated."
YOU DO YOU - As a legal professional, your work is highly specialized—shouldn't your news and analysis be the same? Check out My Law.com, a brand new feature that lets you personalize your Law.com experience by key practice areas, industries, regions, law firms and companies. Choose from more than 150 topics to receive the information that's most relevant to you and what you do. Once you get started, you'll get a daily email with top headlines on your areas of interest.
ON THE RADAR - TrackMan Inc., which sells golfing simulators and other golf-centered products, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against GSP Golf d/b/a GSPro and Davor Bogavac on Tuesday in New York Southern District Court. The suit, brought by White & Case, accuses the defendant of misappropriating the plaintiff's software to develop a competing line of golfing simulators. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:23-cv-00598, TrackMan Inc. v. GSP Golf AB et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
| Elon Musk Takes Aim at Class Action Law Firms in Tesla Securities Trial Testimony By Alaina Lancaster |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Big Company Insiders See Tech-Related Disputes Teed Up for 2025
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Not Here: Court Finds Texas Has No Jurisdiction Over Google
- 2Lawyer's Retirement Benefits Excluded From Marital Property
- 3'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
- 4Supreme Court Takes Up the Corporate Transparency Act: Recent Litigation and Potential Next Steps
- 5Brogdon: The Final Nail in Corbin’s Coffin in Premises Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
