Supply Chain is Driving Innovation in Law
Disruption in Supply Chains is providing an opportunity for innovators in law to deepen relationships with Legal Departments
February 01, 2023 at 10:22 AM
4 minute read
Two years ago when Pacesetter Research published its first report on innovation in how professional services firms approach supply chain, with some noted exceptions it was found that on the whole law firms were content to have a limited but designated role. Our report then noted that "…lawyers have a guaranteed seat at the table in supply chain transformation projects but are typically only brought in to address a handful of technical issues: contract negotiation and management, negotiation support, compliance (e.g., reporting, legislation monitoring and anticipation, supply chain transparency, anti-corruption, trade sanctions, bans and embargoes, and ESG-related issues such as slavery act compliance), and tax." (2021) A fundamental problem with this approach was that supply chain management was undergoing a revolution – an involuntary one, brought on by the economic and political ruptures of the pandemic.
What a supply chain is, how it is managed, who is involved in managing them, who has access to what information, the nature of relationships throughout client supply chains: in 2023, these elements are all seen in profoundly different ways than they were in 2019. Again, none of this happened on a whim. Dramatic changes in how the world works forced companies to go back to the proverbial drawing board and rethink – redesign – their supply chains. The solutions to seemingly straightforward issues like procurement cost controls or a long-time supplier suddenly finding themselves behind a sanction wall turned into supply chain-wide puzzles. After some years of intense investment, we are beginning to see the light at the end of the tunnel, and the benefits of digitally-enabled and connected supply chains are finally becoming apparent: greater transparency, greater flexibility, better risk management, and ultimately greater long-term resiliency.
But the road to this point has not been easy, and not just for clients. The entire ecosystem of professional services firms in the supply chain space also had to pivot, shifting their focus and approach (e.g., core value proposition, service delivery model, etc.) while making big new technology investments. Indeed, several of the Big Four multiservice firms revealed that a majority (north of 50%) of their revenues generated in supply chain projects in 2023 is related to advanced technologies. For Innovators, this evolution in their approach to supply chain has been in many respects dramatic, but it has paid off well. For many, supply chain has become a primary revenue driver often linked to other practice areas like M&A, restructuring, or operational performance optimization.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllALM Market Analysis Report Series: Nashville's Rapid Growth Brings Increased Competition for Law Firms
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 2'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 3The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 4Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 5In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250