Law Firms Look to 'Mergers of Magnitude': The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 03, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
GO BIG OR NO-GO - When it comes to mergers, law firms this year are taking what industry observers (OK, just me) are calling the Tim "The Tool Man" Taylor approach: More power! As Law.com's Jessie Yount reports, large lateral groups and boutique tie-ups were all the rage last year, but more sizeable combinations were announced at least once a week in January, reflecting a common desire among law firm leaders for more transformational growth in one fell swoop. "We're seeing a lot of interest in mergers of magnitude because laterals and [lateral] groups tend to rarely result in net growth, or net growth that is satisfying to the overall strategy," said Kristin Stark, a law firm consultant and principal at Fairfax Associates. Kent Zimmermann, a legal management consultant at the Zeughauser Group, agreed that competitive pressures are leading more firms to consider more sizeable combinations. In fact, most firm leaders "feel as if they are treading water by trying to grow only with laterals…"
COSTLY MISTAKES - At this point, trying (and often failing) to fend off cyber incidents is just the cost of doing business. Unfortunately, as Law.com's Rhys Dipshan writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, the cost is going up. "It's likely that data breaches and data privacy mishaps will become even more costly in the months—and potentially years—ahead, as states and regulators continue to fill the void left by the lack of a federal data privacy law," Dipshan writes, noting that while the Bipartisan American Data Privacy and Protection Act, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives last year, has arguably had more momentum behind it than any other federal data privacy effort in recent years, the midterm election in November 2022, along with opposition to the bill from California's House delegation, has slowed its momentum. To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
ON THE RADAR - Ballard Spahr filed a lawsuit against Blockfusion USA on Thursday in Delaware Court of Chancery. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of A. Searle Field, Evan Field and other plaintiffs, seeks to recover $772,675 in attorneys' fees pursuant to an Oct. 2022 arbitration. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2023-0127, In Re Delaware Rapid Arbitration of Blockfusion USA Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute read'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case
6 minute read28 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
7 minute readHow Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250