Am Law 100 Offices Are Lacking in Efficiency: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 08, 2023 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT - Am Law 100 office space is nowhere near as efficient as it could be, with an average square foot per attorney ratio that is "still relatively high," despite firms' attempts over decades to improve their use of space, according to the Savills 2023 Benchmarking Report. As Law.com's Brenda Sapino Jeffreys reports, the average efficiency among Am Law 100 offices is 985 square feet per attorney, which is higher than the 500-750 sf/atty many firms use as a target occupancy rate. Firms in the Am Law 25 are "somewhat more efficient," the report said, with 30% of offices at 750 sf/atty or less, but only 24% of the rest of the Am Law 100 at that level. However, the report suggests the square footage numbers are likely higher than they could be, because offices are not fully occupied, and if offices are not used, the square footage to attorney ratio increases despite the efficiency of the office. It should also be noted that the report does not specify whether all those offices are empty because people are busy collaborating and innovating in the common areas.
WHAT'S IN A NAME? - The chief legal officer title sounds loftier, but, as Law.com's Trudy Knockless reports, some GCs actually have broader responsibilities. And while companies continue to create CLO roles, the growth is slowing. Hirings with the "chief legal officer" title surged 72% from 2019 through 2022, according to a LinkedIn study of more than 500,000 hirings. But it climbed just 3% in 2022, the final year of that three-year span—a sign that the corporate trend of upgrading the top legal title from general counsel to CLO is slowing, the study found. Recruiters, in-house counsel and other legal observers say the (seemingly) highfalutin CLO title became fashionable in part to reflect legal chiefs' evolution into trusted advisers for the entire business, rather than strictly experts on legal matters. But, at most companies, the title really isn't the point, said Craig Gatarz, who joined the artificial intelligence company Veritone as chief legal officer a year ago. "To me, the portfolio is much more important than the title," he said.
ON THE RADAR - GlaxoSmithKline and Teva Pharmaceutical were slapped with an antitrust class action Tuesday in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court over Lamictal tablets products. The suit contends that the defendants orchestrated to delay generic competition for Lamictal, a prescription drug used to treat epilepsy, bipolar disorder and other medical conditions, by GlaxoSmithKline agreeing not to launch a less expensive authorized generic version of the drug in competition with Teva. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The complaint was filed by Berger Montague; Garwin Gerstein & Fisher and other plaintiff firms. The case is 2:23-cv-00480, Morris & Dickson Co., L.L.C. v. Glaxosmithkline LLC et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
2023 Could Be a Stronger Year for Energy Industry IPOs Amid Rising Investment By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
6 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Use of Psychologists as Coaches/Trial Consultants
- 2Could This Be the Era of Client-Centricity?
- 3New York Mayor Adams Attacks Fed Prosecutor's Independence, Appeals to Trump
- 4Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
- 5The Public-Private Dichotomy in State-Created Insurance Entities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250