The Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling that a sheriff’s deputy did violate a man’s Fourth Amendment rights by attempting a public safety stop that turned into an arrest, drawing a strong dissent that argued “the state failed to present objective, specific and articulable facts” showing the stop had been lawful
In a Feb. 3 ruling in State of Kansas v. McDonald, a 2-1 majority ruled that the deputy’s encounter with defendant Tyler McDonald was a legitimate public safety stop.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
