Why Big Law Layoffs May Continue: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 13, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Law Firm Management
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
LAYOFFS 'LYING IN WAIT'? - Layoffs this past week on both coasts have again unsettled Big Law, and analysts told Law.com's Andrew Maloney that the "difficult decisions" at law firms are probably not over yet this year, especially if the economy experienced more turmoil in 2023. Both New York-based Shearman & Sterling and Seattle-based Davis Wright Tremaine are the latest to make waves in the legal industry, joining the list of law firms making personnel cuts to start 2023 and citing a need to realign capacity with existing and projected demand. Analysts note that, while the current situation is nothing like 2009, which featured reams of layoffs and furloughs, mixed economic projections in 2023 along with odd fundamentals this year have forced companies and law firms to take some action. "Most firm leaders I have spoken with said 2023 will be the most challenging year since the pandemic started," said Kent Zimmermann, a law firm consultant at the Zeughauser Group.
SETTLING UP - Securities litigation filings may have settled in at a "baseline" of 200 to 225 cases per year after a two-year deviation in 2018-2019 to roughly twice that caseload due to issues emanating from SPACs, but, as Law.com's Christine Schiffner reports, settlement values have skyrocketed. "2022 brought more than $4 billion in settlements, which was double what we saw for 2021," Labaton Sucharow chairman Christopher Keller told The National Law Journal—an upward trend he and many other plaintiffs lawyers believe will continue. "There will be a significant number of high-value settlements being struck in the next three to five years." A recent report by ISS tallies the total settlement amount in securities class actions in 2022 at $4.77 billion, while a recent report by Cornerstone Research shows 69% of the core federal filings were made in the Second and Ninth circuits.
ON THE RADAR - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission sued FXL Investment PR, Ramon S. Gomez and other defendants Friday in Puerto Rico District Court over an alleged Ponzi scheme. The lawsuit accuses the defendants of misappropriating at least $13 million of pool participants' funds to pay purported returns and referral commissions to existing pool participants. The complaint further contends that the defendants used pool participant funds to pay business and personal expenses. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 3:23-cv-01065, Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. FX Latino, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Court Rejects 'Alarming' Request for 27 Hours' Worth of Attorney Fees … for Crafting Fee Petition By Riley Brennan |
By Mason Lawlor |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute read'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readAvantia CEO Discusses Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Lock-Maker's Veteran GC Takes Old Job Back After Successor Lasts Just 3 Months
- 2Judge Sets April Retrial Date in Sarah Palin Defamation Action Against NY Times
- 3HSF and Kramer Levin Leaders Set Out Merger Timeline, Structure
- 4'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
- 5Doctrine of ‘Practical Location,’ Breach of a Commercial Lease: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250