Know the Risk: How the Right Insurance Approach Helps GCs With Litigation
With class action lawsuit settlements topping $63 billion, GCs must help their organizations understand what their insurance policies cover.
February 14, 2023 at 11:15 AM
4 minute read
In 2022, 15 class action lawsuits resulted in settlements of $1 billion or more, with the total value of all settlements exceeding $63 billion, a report by the Duane Morris Class Action Review finds. These recent statistics show that class action litigation – from product liability and consumer fraud to data breach actions – remains a significant risk to corporations of all sizes.
Corporate legal teams might think insurance policies are the silver bullet against these class action lawsuit payouts. And while policies can help, in-house counsel must take an active role in understanding their organizations' risk profile, what insurance policies would best respond to those risks, and when to react when a claim comes in the door.
"It's paramount to understand the risks of your business, then build out the controls to minimize the risk that you're going to violate consumer protection laws. Part of that is also actively engaging with your insurance portfolio," says Lilit Asadourian, partner and co-chair of the insurance recovery practice at Barnes & Thornburg.
This is why in-house counsel must understand what insurance policies do and do not cover, and why a close working relationship among C-Suite decision-makers remains a must.
Study the Policy
So-called nuclear verdicts are becoming more common and courts are taking a more liberal approach to insurance coverage. The California Supreme Court recently ruled in Yahoo Inc.'s favor in Telephone Consumer Privacy Act (TCPA) litigation, finding insurer AIG had a duty to defend its insured in five class actions involving unsolicited text messages under a personal injury liability clause in Yahoo's commercial general liability (CGL) policy.
"What we expect is that the industry will react by scrambling to add TCPA exclusions to CGL policies to avoid further expansion," says Asadourian.
The lesson for GCs is clear: Understand what their company's class action risks are – and whether their insurance provides the correct coverage.
"In financial services, for example, you must comply with consumer protection statutes on lending, foreclosures, and repossessions," says Asadourian. "For companies that are lead generators, we see the TCPA issue over and over again. Sit down with a broker and insurance lawyer and ask whether you're getting the best coverage and what exclusions or sub-limits are problematic."
There isn't one specific insurance that responds to class actions, says Asadourian, which is why understanding risks is crucial.
Partner With C-Suite Decision Makers
Purchasing and managing insurance is typically the CFO's purview, but these priorities may not line up with the legal department.
"CFOs are often thinking, 'what's the cheapest policy we can get for the most coverage?' That doesn't always line up with the GC's priorities," says Asadourian. "GCs should lead a bi-annual check-in with those within their organizations who buy the policies."
Coverage attorneys can help by giving policies a health check, she says, noting that claim advocacy starts before a claim is in the door. Legal departments should also develop a response timeline and protocol for when claims do come in.
"Notice is black and white under most claims made policies," says Asadourian. "You could settle that one claim privately, but if you get a class action making the same allegations six months later, your carrier could say there's no coverage because you didn't give timely notice."
The point, says Asadourian, is that companies have insurance for catastrophic lawsuits for a reason but knowing what policies cover and working with C-Suite decision-makers can reduce additional risk. "You want to be protected," she says.
Barnes & Thornburg's Insurance Recovery and Counseling practice has additional information for in-house counsel about insurance and risk.
Johanna Marmon is a writer in upstate New York who has been reporting on trends impacting the legal industry for more than 15 years.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
First Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readState Appellate Court Affirms $4M Prejudgment Interest Award on $40M Wrongful Death Verdict
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 2Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 3The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 4Trump 2.0 and Your Career
- 5Matt's Corner: Contributory Negligence Can Be a Bar to Legal Malpractice Recovery
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250