Law Firms Face a Lack of Loyalty: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 14, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
LACKING LOYALTY - Happy Valentine's Day! Here's some free relationship advice (for law firms). The pandemic has bolstered legal market free agency by weakening the bonds many lawyers had with their firms. "Decades ago, people were very loyal to their firms and would try and stay with that job forever," Mark Jacobson, managing director of legal recruiting firm LegalSearch USA, said. "But attorneys are careerists now. They know their clients are interested in them and what they can do, not necessarily their firm." Still, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney, Patrick Smith and Hank Grezlak report, while some firm leaders are struggling to adapt, a number of legal industry observers said that shift in dynamics is something that law firm leaders should embrace. For instance, one thing firms can do to strengthen their organizational glue is reemphasize that every worker is valued and can do meaningful work. This is the third installment in a series examining how legal industry workers and the workplace have been altered by the pandemic. The previous two articles can be found here and here.
LEGAL OPS LAYOFFS LOOMING? - The possibility of an economic downturn has impacted companies differently, with some undergoing cost-cutting measures and layoffs, while others are reporting periods of growth and staff expansions. It's no surprise then that some teams have grown more worried than others. While legal operations functions have gained popularity in legal departments over the last couple of years, they have now become the target of some staff cuts. And looking ahead, experts suggested to Law.com's Cassandre Coyer that more layoffs could be on the horizon, especially for the legal operations functions that have been acting more as administrative support rather than strategic ones. Whether these cuts will benefit companies in the long term is uncertain, sources said. "Are legal ops professionals going to be impacted by layoffs? The answer's yes. Will they potentially be more vulnerable than other components of legal departments? I think the answer to that is yes," said Mark Yacano, managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's Transform Advisory Services team, pointing to a growing number of announcements on LinkedIn from recently laid-off legal ops professionals.
ON THE RADAR - Tyson Fresh Meats was hit with an antitrust lawsuit Monday in Washington Eastern District Court. The court action was brought on behalf of Cody Allen Easterday of Easterday Ranches, who claims that cattle feeders in the Pacific Northwest are forced to sell their stock to Tyson, which exerts its anticompetitive advantage in the market to control pricing and stipulate contractual terms in its favor. The complaint was filed by Arnall Golden Gregory; Etter McMahon Lamberson Van Wert & Oreskovich; and Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 4:23-cv-05019, Easterday v. Tyson Fresh Meats Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Senate Confirms Cindy Chung as First Asian American Judge to Serve on 3rd Circuit By Avalon Zoppo |
Deadline Set: Bankruptcy Judge Will Hear 3M Earplug Dismissal Motion in April By Amanda Bronstad |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 2Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 3Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
- 4Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 5Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250