Why Even Uncertain Economic Times Call For Legal Tech Investments
AI and tech stacks investments are key to easing data movement and contact between parties regardless of the current economic situation.
February 22, 2023 at 06:48 PM
4 minute read
Legal ServicesBy 2025, 97 percent of legal departments will require law firms to describe their technology before they are hired, according to a 2022 study published by Wolters Kluwer.
The findings underscore new transformation trends and the increasingly important role technology – already a key driver of efficiency and productivity – plays in the selection of legal providers. The results also come as the legal industry emerges from the pandemic but now, just like many other sectors, is facing new macroeconomic pressures as well as the potential for a recession.
During these uncertain economic times – which have led to a combination of higher interest rates and increased inflation – having the right legal technology stacks, and getting as much value from them as possible, is critical. Moreover, the choices that organizations make now will have a huge impact on legal teams once the economy improves, observed Katie DeBord, Vice President of Product Strategy at DISCO.
"We're seeing a sea change where clients really are paying attention to who is using technology appropriately to minimize the labor-intensive tasks that humans have been accustomed to doing," DeBord says.
Legal professionals need to know not only what tech trends are changing the profession, but also how to leverage their relationship with suppliers to ensure they are getting the most out of what tools they already own.
Tech Trends: Boosting Collaboration and Deploying AI
Three tech categories will influence legal organizations' investment decisions over the next year, DeBord notes.
The first is technology that facilitates collaboration. An example is technology that expedites the movement of information, such as automated legal hold technology that manages legal hold compliance with minimal intervention by the file owners or the law department. Another example is technology that accelerates decisions and deals by embedding within that technology a pre-approved "playbook" that can be used for negotiation without unnecessary duplication by the lawyers.
The second is technology that enhances insights. Artificial intelligence "allows people to absorb information faster and understand insights that they wouldn't otherwise see," says DeBord. Litigation technology that is enhanced with the right AI, for example, can allow you not only to see trends in behavior, and gaps in timelines, but also to get to your theory of the case faster.
The third is technology that handles tasks humans shouldn't have to. Examples include transaction-closing, e-signature and NDA automation software.
White-Glove Treatment Paves the Way
One hurdle to innovation and tech adoption is that legal users aren't always shown how they can use technology within their practice areas for the benefit of them and their clients. White-glove treatment can avoid technology going underused, DeBord says. This means either embedding people in your organization who better understand the users' practices and can serve as the go-between, or ensuring that your technology provider will provide such white-glove treatment to your users.
Additionally, tech alone is not enough for legal organizations to improve efficiency and production, she says. Legal departments and law firms also need to map their operations to ensure that the technology either works within existing processes or that processes are re-configured to optimize the use of the technology. An easy example, she says, is contract lifecycle management systems.
"Clients will say to me, 'we need a contract management system.' But they've never reviewed their existing processes for managing their contracts," DeBord says. "You do need to take a discerning approach to technology to know what type of institutional requirements it will create, and whether it is the right solution that can fit into your existing processes."
Once those questions are answered, the next step is to determine whether the proposed technology choices are scalable across the business. "For international businesses, a starting question is 'Can everyone in the cross-border practice use it?'" DeBord suggests. Oftentimes tech decisions are made without regard to nuances in international rules that can impact whether the technology is usable from one jurisdiction to the next.
And finally, perhaps the biggest challenge of all is change management. "Don't underestimate the importance of and challenges associated with change management," she says. "If your leadership does not insist on change and change adoption at all levels, it will be almost impossible to successfully implement large-scale technological change throughout your organization."
Pamela Brownstein is a freelance writer covering legal issues and the business of law.
Want to learn more about how technology is changing the legal profession and what that means for your career? Check out DISCO's Just Hearsay podcast where DISCO leaders and their special guests discuss what's new, what's exciting and what's possible with the right legal technology.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Companies' Dirty Little Secret: Those Privacy Opt-Out Requests Usually Aren't Honored
Ballooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250