Pacesetter Research: The business value of legal departments
Legal departments are caught between a rock and a hard place with spend management, but the solution involves more than just accounting software
February 26, 2023 at 04:42 PM
4 minute read
If you look up "cost center," more often than not the accompanying example in the description will be in-house legal departments. Worse, company unit heads often see their legal departments in the same way American diplomats saw the aging Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev in the 1970s and 80s, as the department of "Nyet" where ideas go to die. This is an unfair characterization, but still, it is indicative of where in most organizations legal departments land in terms of budget priorities.
This puts legal departments in a tough spot because in 2023, they're being asked to contribute more in their organization. They are often called upon to provide opinions on diverse issues such as labor law, cyber risk, or third-party contract management – while, like most cost centers, being expected to manage costs (read: "resources") downward. The math is simple: the volume of work for legal departments is up, while they are being asked to reduce costs – targeted costs such as outside counsel spend, but across the board as well. ALM's Pacesetter Research team has been speaking to legal departments around the world, representing organizations ranging from mid-sized companies to Fortune 500 firms, and yet to our amazement dedicated legal operations resources are not yet the standard norm. To that point, a year ago we launched the first in a series of reports focused on legal departments, looking at how legal departments develop and utilize legal operations capabilities. The importance of legal operations (for both legal departments and law firms, quite frankly) nowadays was illustrated by the surprisingly large number of professional services providers we found building out and investing in their legal operations practices.
This year, we're taking the next step and examining legal departments' spend management. This was in part driven by conversations we were having with legal departments, in which they expressed spend management as being among their top priorities, on par with matter management. With the pandemic winding down (albeit with some lingering effects such as confused office strategies, raging inflation, geopolitical volatility, etc.), legal departments are, more than ever, being asked to help shape risk and compliance management strategies, often with fewer staff and resources.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllALM Market Analysis Report Series: Nashville's Rapid Growth Brings Increased Competition for Law Firms
Trending Stories
- 1Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 2'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 3Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 4The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 5Trump 2.0 and Your Career
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250