Law.com Compass: ChatGPT, Friend or Foe?
As ChatGPT becomes more prevalent in the legal sphere, the use of AI can be a double edged sword.
February 27, 2023 at 11:29 AM
4 minute read
ChatGPT and its potential to be revolutionary have been in the cultural zeitgeist of late. In the legal sphere, this revolution has led to talk in the industry about ChatGPT becoming a game-changing tool with the potential to lead to the end of lawyers as we know it (or, at the very least, junior lawyers). So, will ChatGPT mean that the role of a lawyer will become obsolete? Almost definitely, it will not. However, the use of this innovative technology, which leverages artificial intelligence (AI), does pose several questions for law firms to consider. This includes how it can be effectively used as well as issues that could arise from its use. Such a discussion is now being held in law firm boardrooms. This discussion is not only focused on assessing the impacts of AI, but perhaps more importantly, how such technology can be utilized to streamline work and generate efficiencies.
Law firms across the globe have started looking at how ChatGPT can be leveraged to, among other things, undertake more low-value work and free up a lawyer's billable time for more meaningful and revenue-generating tasks. Speaking with individuals who have used ChatGPT internally within firms, some believe that while ChatGPT does have benefits, the idea of it revolutionizing the legal industry is perhaps short-sighted. One of the key issues is that ChatGPT is not specifically designed to handle legal matters. Thus, there is a risk that when drawing up contracts and other legal-specific documents, the technology can actually create additional risk exposure through error. Another reservation is the time and investment involved in rolling out ChatGPT. Currently, it appears that the technology is largely being used by internal legal technology teams. Adoption by other parts and individuals within a firm will take time. As with all technology, by the time lawyers and other staff are comfortable with using ChatGPT, a newer and potentially better form of AI may come on the market.
The use of ChatGPT and AI has the potential to add another tool to a lawyer's toolkit and, as mentioned, provides the opportunity to streamline work and focus a lawyer's time on more revenue-generating activities. It's little wonder why there is such excitement in the industry around it. However, as with most other technology used by law firms, there is also an element of risk that must be mitigated, and it's this risk that is making some firms wary of ChatGPT. This fear is firmly rooted in the cybersecurity implications, which are now at the top of the agenda for firms, not just from a reputational perspective but also in terms of costs. According to ALM's LTN Tech Survey 2022, 93% of respondents indicated that the price of their firm's cyber insurance had increased from the previous year. Furthermore, when asked what they perceived were the biggest threats to their firm's security stemming from technology usage, 39% selected employee negligence or mistakes, while 36% selected ransomware attacks. With ChatGPT being web-based and the need for users to input information, there is a heightened risk of users releasing sensitive information or accidentally downloading ransomware onto devices. Therefore, robust management, training, and ongoing moderation of its usage by lawyers will be required to help mitigate against these risks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllALM Market Analysis Report Series: Nashville's Rapid Growth Brings Increased Competition for Law Firms
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250