Law.com Compass: ChatGPT, Friend or Foe?
As ChatGPT becomes more prevalent in the legal sphere, the use of AI can be a double edged sword.
February 27, 2023 at 11:29 AM
4 minute read
ChatGPT and its potential to be revolutionary have been in the cultural zeitgeist of late. In the legal sphere, this revolution has led to talk in the industry about ChatGPT becoming a game-changing tool with the potential to lead to the end of lawyers as we know it (or, at the very least, junior lawyers). So, will ChatGPT mean that the role of a lawyer will become obsolete? Almost definitely, it will not. However, the use of this innovative technology, which leverages artificial intelligence (AI), does pose several questions for law firms to consider. This includes how it can be effectively used as well as issues that could arise from its use. Such a discussion is now being held in law firm boardrooms. This discussion is not only focused on assessing the impacts of AI, but perhaps more importantly, how such technology can be utilized to streamline work and generate efficiencies.
Law firms across the globe have started looking at how ChatGPT can be leveraged to, among other things, undertake more low-value work and free up a lawyer's billable time for more meaningful and revenue-generating tasks. Speaking with individuals who have used ChatGPT internally within firms, some believe that while ChatGPT does have benefits, the idea of it revolutionizing the legal industry is perhaps short-sighted. One of the key issues is that ChatGPT is not specifically designed to handle legal matters. Thus, there is a risk that when drawing up contracts and other legal-specific documents, the technology can actually create additional risk exposure through error. Another reservation is the time and investment involved in rolling out ChatGPT. Currently, it appears that the technology is largely being used by internal legal technology teams. Adoption by other parts and individuals within a firm will take time. As with all technology, by the time lawyers and other staff are comfortable with using ChatGPT, a newer and potentially better form of AI may come on the market.
The use of ChatGPT and AI has the potential to add another tool to a lawyer's toolkit and, as mentioned, provides the opportunity to streamline work and focus a lawyer's time on more revenue-generating activities. It's little wonder why there is such excitement in the industry around it. However, as with most other technology used by law firms, there is also an element of risk that must be mitigated, and it's this risk that is making some firms wary of ChatGPT. This fear is firmly rooted in the cybersecurity implications, which are now at the top of the agenda for firms, not just from a reputational perspective but also in terms of costs. According to ALM's LTN Tech Survey 2022, 93% of respondents indicated that the price of their firm's cyber insurance had increased from the previous year. Furthermore, when asked what they perceived were the biggest threats to their firm's security stemming from technology usage, 39% selected employee negligence or mistakes, while 36% selected ransomware attacks. With ChatGPT being web-based and the need for users to input information, there is a heightened risk of users releasing sensitive information or accidentally downloading ransomware onto devices. Therefore, robust management, training, and ongoing moderation of its usage by lawyers will be required to help mitigate against these risks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllALM Market Analysis Report Series: Nashville's Rapid Growth Brings Increased Competition for Law Firms
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250